The High Court of Chhattisgarh allowed an appeal under Order 43 Rule 1 (r) CPC against the dismissal of an injunction application for want of prosecution.
MA No. 95/2015 is restored to its original number; no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
MCC No. 346 of 2016
M/s Didwaniya Builders Proprietor Didwaniya Axim Private Limited, Through Its Director Shri Ashish Didwaniya, S/o Shri Sitaram Didwaniya (Earlier Represented By Shri Sitaram Didwaniya), Aged About 32 Years, R/o Choubey Colony, Raipur, Tahsil And District Raipur (Chhattisgarh) Civil & Revenue District Raipur
---- Applicant
Versus
Pt. Ravishanker University Raipur (Chhattisgarh) Through Its Vice Chancellor, Pt. Ravishanker Shukla University, Raipur, District Raipur (Chhattisgarh)
---- Respondent
For applicant : Ms. Prachi Jaiswal, Adv. For Respondent : Mr. Neeraj Choubey, Adv.
Hon'ble Shri Justice Chandra Bhushan Bajpai Order On Board
01/12/2016
Sd/(Chandra Bhushan Bajpai) Judge
Pathak
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Appeal under Order 43 Rule 1 (r) CPC against the dismissal of injunction application should be allowed?
2 provisions across 1 enactments
M/s Didwaniya Builders Proprietorship and M/s Didwaniya Axim Private Limited through Dir. Ashish Didwaniya
Pt. Ravishanker University through VC
Chandra Bhushan Bajpai
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
