appellant is not admitting this fact that he committed sexual intercourse with the prosecutrix. Learned counsel for the appellant would sum up his argument that as the prosecution has failed to prove its case that the prosecutrixwas subjected to rape against her will and consent by the appellant, the appeal may be allowed The appellant mayibe acquitted of the charges. x 1 0. P,er_contra, learned counsel for the respondent/ State duly : "§ supported the impugned judgment passed bythe trial Court and submitted that as the prosecutrix is an illiterate lady hardly signs; Pusore police sUppressed the material fact and later on, when she narrated the fact of rape before the authorities then the s matter was investigated. Thexfprosecution duly proved that she was subjected to rape hence the appeal may be dismissed. ln‘ order to appreciate the argument advanced on behalf of the parties, i have perused'the evidence adduced by the prosecution arltd also other facts available. 12. Upon minute examination of the statement of the witnesses and l other facts, it appears that on the next day at 2.30 pm the priosecutrixherself lodged the report which was for the offence udder Section 354, IPC. On the basis of this report, police registered the case, has taken statement under Section 161 of the Cr.P.C. of the prosecutrix P.W. 1, P.W. 3 Pushpa, her sister, “PWV l 4 Baidehi, her mother on 11—2—1996 and after due investigation, charge sheet has been filed. After 7 months, the prosecutrix gave a typewritten report prepared by her counsel Ex. P1. This is the first document regarding commission of ..\ offence of rape by the appellant‘but in the entire Ex. Pt,, it is N
