Allowed

Smt. Mangali and Ors. v. Buntylal Joshi and Ors.

Chhattisgarh HC9 Jul 2016MAC/990/2012

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Lok Adalat accepted an amicable settlement where a former minor appellant requested to conduct compromise. The court accepted the agreement and directed the respondent insurer to pay additional compensation of Rs.50,000 plus interest.

What did the court decide?

Remand of claim to reconcile; ORIGINIA Insurance Company Ltd to pay Rs.50,000 plus 6% interest to appellant No.1 within 60 days.

Smt. Mangali and Ors. Vs Buntylal Joshi and Ors. — Motor Accident Claims | Chhattisgarh HC (2016)

¶1

r:' Ca
fr

¶2

CHHATTISGARH^{HIGHCOURT,BILASPUR} NATIQNAL^LOKADALAT

¶3

¶4

Judge^— Lok^Adalat : Hon'ble Mr.^{JusticeChandraBhushanBajpai} Member^{—LokAdalat:ShriVinayHarit,Advocate}

¶5

Case No.^{Misc.Appe‘al} (C)^No.99oof2012

¶6

1.Smt‘ Mangali^{W/oLateLaliAgedAbout3OYearsViHage&Posh} Dilmili Pachanar^{Chowk,Jagdalpur,P.S.Kodenar,Distt.Bastar} C.G. Pin-⁴⁹⁴⁴⁴² 2. Shankar Madawi S/o Late Jagra^AgedAbout 17 Years^Thru— appellant^No.1 Natural Guardian^Mother (Adopted)^{R/oVillage&Post—} Dilmili Pachanar^{Chowk,Jagdalpur,} P.S. Kodenar, Distt. Bastar C.G. Pin- 494442 Appellants versus i 9 M al Joshi Slo Laxman Josl'ii Agixd’] bout 24 Years R/o nteshwari Ward, Post— Jagdalpur, P.S. Kot tt Bastar^C.G. 'i n- 494001 (Driver) 2. Balkrish n T hakur R/o Gang a Bodhghat, Post a star C.G.(Owner)^Pm—494001 3. The Oriental m pany Ltd. Thru-^Branch Manager, Branch Office- Hot ;venue, Medical College Road, Post— Jagdalpur,^P.S.Ko t star C.G. Pin—⁴⁹⁴⁰⁰¹ (insurer)

¶7

m- Respondents

¶8

Shri P.K.^Tulsyan, Advoca lla nts. Shri Anand^Gupta,Advoo ate e nt 3/ OIC.

¶9

Respondents^1and2not

¶10

ORDER

¶11

(Passed^{on09thJuly,2016)}

¶12

Shri P.K. Tulsyan has presented an affidavit executed by appellant No.2- Shankar^{MandawithatastheappellantNo.2wasminoratthetimeof} filing the claims case before Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Bastar at Jagdaipur^on 20.11.2009, he tiled the case through his natural guardianmother. He submits that n‘ow, he had attained the majority and has no objection^{foranyawardamount} granted^{bythisCourtbegiventoappellant} No.1,^{hismother,whoadoptedhim.}

¶13

As the^{trialCourtbyawarddated12.7.2012directedthattheaward} amount be given^{onlytoappellantNo.1,theprayermadebylearnedcounsel}

¶14

wm%

¶15

¶16

for the appellant^No.2 supporting with^{anaffidavit,isconsideredandallowed.}

¶17

The award^is passed^asunder:

¶18

The contesting parties to this appeal have amicably settled/compromised the dispute, which is subject matter of this appeal, voluntarily. We have also found that the terms and conditions of compromise/settlement arrived at between the contesting parties are just, proper^and legal and hence are acceptableJWe accordingly accept the compromise/settlement, proposed^{bythepartiesandorderthat} respondent No.3— The^Oriental Insurance^{CompanyLimited} shall pay in addition^tothe award passed^{bytheMotorAccidentClaimsTribunal} Bastar at Jagdalpur^to the appellant^No 1 a sum of^Rs500OOOI- (Rupees^{Fivelacsonly)bywayof} compensation Within sixty days from^toda thenNIse Interest @^6% per J n-be payable till Its realization

¶19

l,
Sd/—
J
’
(c B Bajp‘)
Judge Lok Adal
High Court of Chhatti
Bilaspur

¶20

,) Lok Adalat High Court^{ofChhattisgarh} Bilaspur

Smt. Mangali and Ors. v. Buntylal Joshi and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Smt. Mangali and Ors. v. Buntylal Joshi and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ramkrishna Sharma Vs State Of Chhattisgarh

Romanlal Vs Brijbhusan

Mohd. Imran Khan @ Sonu Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Smt. Nalini Mehta Vs Bhuneshwar Sahu and Ors.

Smt. Parwati Bai Vs Leeladhar and Ors.

Banarasi Ram and Ors. Vs Smt. Meenu Singh and Ors.