Disposed

Banarasi Ram and Ors. v. Smt. Meenu Singh and Ors.

Chhattisgarh HC9 Jul 2016MAC/402/2013

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Local Area Committee Lok Adalat accepted the voluntary compromise settlement between the appellants and respondents, ordering the New India Insurance Co. Ltd. to pay additional compensation of Rs. 2,00,000/- within three months.

What did the court decide?

The New India Insurance Co. Ltd. ordered to pay Rs. 2,00,000/-.comprising additional compensation to the appellants within three months, with 6% interest on delayed payment.

Banarasi Ram and Ors. Vs Smt. Meenu Singh and Ors. — Chhattisgarh HC (2016) — LawSathi Research

¶1

^,!

¶2

¶3

CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT. BILASPUR N AT±ONALLOK ADALAT

¶4

Judge - LokAdalat: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Chandra Bhushan Bajpai Member - LokAdalat: Shri Vinay Harit,Sr. Advocate

¶5

!VIACNo,4Q2of2013

¶6

Banarasi Ram S/o Late Jagmohan Yadav Aged About 42 Years R/o Wadrafnagar Office OfAgriculture Development Officer, Wadrafnagar, Distt. Balrampur (occupation service clerk') C.G.

¶7

Premchand S/o Banarasi Ram YadavAged About 22 Years

¶8

Chandra Prafap S/o^Banafasi Ramyi'adav Aged About 18 Years

¶9

Ky, Piemlata D/o Banarasi Rann YadavAgea About 15 Years IVIinor,

¶10

^Stmi- Legal Guardian, Banarsi Ram, R/o Wadrafnagar, P.S. Basantpur, Distt. BalrampurC.G. „,,,„,,„ ; . S

¶11

Ku. Premkumari D&,ganafasifliaB"^Yaday Aged About .12 ''fears Minor, R- 2 to 5 R/o WadcafBagaS.I^sBasanfpur, Distt. Balrampur C.G.

¶12

¶13

^sW WW!

¶14

¶15

'yywiffsWTs us

¶16

'Smt. Meenu Singh WSi4sS|toshSin@hR/oA-2/d.l.G.Colony,Waranasi, P.S. Warapasi (U.PfSS&ffSiKw^

¶17

Bhanupratap TiwaniSNtBI'iagwan fliwari Aged About 22jYears R/o Sahatwar, Distt. BaB^ail-iaEaOitfjtesent R/o Bilaspur CMowk, Ambikapur, P.&. Ambikapur, Distt:'Surg'ti]g?ie.G.

¶18

The New India Insurance Co.Ltd. Thru-The Divisional Manager, Divisional Office, Korba, P.S. & Distt. Korba C.G.

¶19

United India Insu.Co.Ltd. Thru- The Branch Manager, Branch Office, Near Ram Mandir, Ambikapur, P.S. Ambikapur, Distt. Surguja C.G.

¶20

-— Respondents

¶21

Mr. D.N. Pr'ajapati, Adv. for the appellants.

¶22

Mr. Deepak Gupta, Adv. for R-3.

¶23

Mr. Dashrath Gupta, Adv. for R-4.

¶24

R-1 and 2 not noticed.

¶25

AWARD

¶26

(Passed on 9-7-2016)

¶27

;The contesting parties to this appeal have amicably tettled/compromised the dispute, which is subject matter of this appeal, voluntanly. We have also found that the terms and conditions of compromise/settlement arrived at between the contesting parties are just, proper and legal and hence are acceptable. We accordingly accept the compromise/settlement, proppsed by the parties and order that in addition to the amount of compensation awarded by the Tribunal, the respondent No. 3/ The new India Assurance Company Limited shall pay to the

¶28

"•*
'""-
"wy'.! f
1 •^'f'ti
^.
,iw^'-"

¶29

¶30

appellants a sum of Rs. 2,00,OOO/- (Rs. two lacs only) by way of compensation, within 3 months from today, otherwise, interest @ 6% per annum shall also be

¶31

——--__ payable till its realization.

¶32

Sd/i, (Chandra Bhushan Bajpai) Judge - LokAdalat High Court of Chhattisgarh Bilaspur

¶33

Sd/-

¶34

(Vinay^Harit) Member-LokAdalat High Court of Chhattisgarh Bilaspur

¶35

^H^T '^TT'^S-^'i--^!;^

Banarasi Ram and Ors. v. Smt. Meenu Singh and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Banarasi Ram and Ors. v. Smt. Meenu Singh and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ramkrishna Sharma Vs State Of Chhattisgarh

Romanlal Vs Brijbhusan

Mohd. Imran Khan @ Sonu Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Smt. Nalini Mehta Vs Bhuneshwar Sahu and Ors.

Smt. Mangali and Ors. Vs Buntylal Joshi and Ors.

Smt. Parwati Bai Vs Leeladhar and Ors.