Chhattisgarh State Power Distribution Company Ltd. v. Vijay Chand Dewangan
Case brief
What is this about?
CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR Order Sheet CRMP No.…
CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR Order Sheet CRMP No.…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
Order Sheet
CRMP No. 212 of 2016
Chhattisgarh State Power Distribution Company Ltd. Versus Vijay Chand Dewangan
| 12/07/2016 | Shri Ghanshyam Patel, Advocate for the applicant. Shri Vipin Tiwari, Advocate for the respondent. |
|---|---|
| The instant Cr.M.P. has been preferred within its | |
| limitation. Heard on the application for grant of leave under Section 378(4) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (in short 'the Code'). The respondent/accused held acquitted for the charges under Section 135 of the Electricity Act, 2003 by the Special Judge under the Electricity Act, 2003, Balod, C.G. in Special Complaint Case No.6700003/2013 vide judgment dated 31-10- 2015. On behalf of the complainant it is submitted that there is sufficient evidence so as to hear the acquittal appeal on its merit challenging the acquittal passed by the trial Court. Hence, leave to appeal may be granted. Perused the evidence adduced during the trial on behalf of the complainant/applicant, as provided in proviso after the proviso of (ii) of Sub-section (1) of Section 135 of the Electricity Act, 2003, the presumption clause and the evidence adduced on behalf of the complainant, without commenting anything on its merit, in totality, it would be appropriate to grant leave to appeal against the judgment of acquittal passed by the trial Court. Consequently, the instant Cr.M.P. is hereby allowed. |
| Registry is directed to | register | the | Acquittal Appeal, |
|---|---|---|---|
| further directed to list the matter acquittal appeal after two weeks. Cr.M.P. allowed. |
for hea | ring | on motion of said |
| (Chan |
dra B |
Sd/- hushan Bajpai) Judge |
Aadil
2 provisions across 2 enactments
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court