In an application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of Cr.P.C., the Chhattisgarh High Court rejected the prayer, holding that the nature of allegations and material on record precluded the grant of bail in the cheating case.
Application for anticipatory bail rejected; order passed not inclined to grant bail.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
MCRCA No.673 of 2015
Mohammad Imran Kadari S/o Md. Eqabal Kadari Aged About 26 years R/o Pension Bada, Police Line, Raipur, Tah. And District Raipur (Civil & Rev. District Raipur), Chhattisgarh.
---- Petitioner
Versus
State Of Chhattisgarh Through Station House Officer, Police Station Ganj, Raipur District Raipur (Civil And Rev. District Raipur), Chhattisgarh.
---- Respondent
For Petitioner : Shri Dhiraj Kumar Wankhede, Advocate For Respondent/State : Ms. Sunita Jain, Panel Lawyer
Order On Board
04/08/2015
The applicant has preferred this application under Section 438 of Cr.P.C., apprehending his arrest in connection with Crime No.31/2015, registered at Police Station–Ganj, District Raipur for alleged commission of offence under Sections 420 of IPC .
2
by submitting that more than one person has stated that the money was paid in their presence to the applicant by the complainant by selling his own land for Rs.6 Lakh to one Prabhu Ram Sahu.
Sd/Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Judge
Tumane
1 issue framed by the court
Whether anticipatory bail ought to be granted to the applicant in the present case.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Mohammad Imran Kadari
State Of Chhattisgarh
Manindra Mohan Shrivastava
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
