The High Court rejected an application for anticipatory bail filed by two cooperative society employees. The court held the applicants were directly responsible for paddy receipt and custody, decisive against granting relief.
The bail application is rejected. The benefit of anticipatory bail is not extended to the applicants.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
MCRCA No. 648 of 2015
---- Applicants
Versus
State Of Chhattisgarh Through: Station House Officer, Police Station- Sarangarh, District- Raigarh, Chhattisgarh
---- Respondent
| For Applicants | - Shri A.P. |
Sharma, Advocate |
|---|---|---|
| For Respondent/State | - Shri R.K. |
Gupta, Dy. A.G. |
Order On Board
04/08/2015
Heard.
Sd/-
Manindra Mohan Shrivastava
J U D G E
Rekha
1 issue framed by the court
Whether anticipatory bail ought to be granted to applicants apprehending arrest in connection with alleged cheating and essential commodities offences.
Nirmal Das Vaishnav
Lakhan Lal Chauhan
State Of Chhattisgarh
Manindra Mohan Shrivastava
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
