Dismissed

Mauji Ram Sahu @ Ravikant Sahu v. State Of Chhattisgarh

Chhattisgarh HC16 Nov 2015MCRC/5974/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Chhattisgarh rejected the bail application under Section 439 CrPC for an accused allegedly involved in cheating and forgery offences involving a substantial sum, holding that bail was not inclined given the pendency of a charge sheet and the rejection of bail for a co-accused.

What did the court decide?

Application for regular bail was rejected.

Mauji Ram Sahu @ Ravikant Sahu Vs… — Contract and Commercial Disputes | Chhattisgarh HC (2015)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BIL

¶2

Order Sheet

¶3

MCRC No. 5974 of 2015

¶4

Mauji Ram Sahu @ Ravikant Sahu S/O Mahesh Kumar Sahu Aged About 34 Years R/O Village Saklor, P.S. Suhela, Distt. Baloda Bazar Bhatapara, Chhattisgarh.

¶5

---- Petitioner

¶6

Versus

¶7

State Of Chhattisgarh Through Station House Officer, P.S. Pandri, Distt. Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

¶8

16.11.2015

---- Respondent
Mr. Rajesh Singh, counsel for the applicant.
Mr. Anil S. Pandey, Govt. Advocate, for the State.
This is an application filed u/s 439 of the Code of
Criminal Procedure for grant of bail to the applicant in
connection with Crime No.253/2014 registered at P.S.
Pandri, District Raipur (C.G) for the offence punishable u/s
420, 467, 468, 471/34 IPC.
As per the prosecution case, on the pretext of
providing job in the railway department, the accused
alongwith other accused Malkam Verma has received
amounts to the tune of Rs.9,50,000/- from different
complainants and thereafter, he gave them false
appointment letters which were found to be forged.
Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the
main allegations are against the Malkam Verma who was
the main instrument in the entire case. He further submits
that the charge sheet has been filed and therefore,
applicant may be enlarged on regular bail.
Per contra, learned State Counsel opposes the bail
application and submits that the bail application of other
co-accused has been rejected.
Having regard to the fact that the bail of the other
co-accused has been rejected and similar allegations are

¶9

	levelled against the applicant that he received the amounts from different complainants amounting to Rs.9,50,000/- on the pretext of providing jobs in the department of Railways and thereafter false appointment letters were issued to them, I am not inclined to release the applicant on bail. Accordingly, the bail application is rejected.
	Sd/-
Rao	GOUTAM BHADURI JUDGE

Mauji Ram Sahu @ Ravikant Sahu v. State Of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mauji Ram Sahu @ Ravikant Sahu v. State Of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Vinod Agrawal Alias Maggu Vs State Of Chhattisgarh

Lalchand Agrawal Vs Pramod Kumar and Ors.

Smt. Lata Soni Vs State Of Chhattisgarh

Baliram Kashyap Vs State Of Chhattisgarh

Sanjay Kohli Vs State Of Chhattisgarh

Gopal Ram Vs State Of Chhattisgarh