The High Court at Bilaspur dismissed a review petition filed by an applicant against an earlier appeal order. The court held that no manifest error or new facts were shown, and the petition sought to relitigate the merits impermissibly under the guise of a review.
The review petition is without substance and is hereby dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No. 1
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
REVIEW PETITION No. 47 of 2015
---- Applicant
Versus
---- Respondents
(By Circulation in Chamber)
SB : Hon’ble Shri Goutam Bhaduri, J.
ORDER
06.11.2015
Page No. 2
heard. The applicant was given proper opportunity of hearing and reading of the review application would show that fresh detailed facts has been pleaded.
Page No. 3
Sd/(Goutam Bhaduri) Judge
balram
3 issues framed by the court
Whether a review petition can be used to argue the entire case afresh on merits instead of addressing only manifest errors or new facts.
Whether the errors alleged in the review petition are self-evident and apparent on the face of the record as required for a review.
Whether the review petition deserves to be dismissed for being misconceived and without substance.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
State of West Bengal and others Vs. Kamal Sengupta and anotherReferred¶24
State of West Bengal and others Vs. Kamal Sengupta and another (2008) 8 SCC 612 · Who else cites this
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Lalchand Agrawal
Pramod Kumar
Praveen Kumar
Smt. Sohaga Bai
Avinash Agrawal
Goutam Bhaduri
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
