In this criminal revision filed by the applicant challenging an impugned order, the court dismissed the petition for want of prosecution due to the applicant's absence and lack of representation on the hearing date.
Revisions was dismissed for want of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
Criminal Revision No. 101 of 2015
Shankar S/o Shri Dulal Daloi, aged about 23 years, R/o Ganga Vihar Amlidih, Near Pani Tankey Amlidih Raipur, Police Station new Rajendra Nagar, Raipur, District Raipur (CG)
---- Applicant
Versus
State Of Chhattisgarh Through Station House Officer, Police Station : Rajendra Nagar, Raipur, District Raipur (CG)
---- Respondent
For Applicant : None present For Respondent : Mr.Anupam Dubey, Dy.Govt.Advocate
Hon’ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal
Order on Board
14/08/2015
1. By this revision, the applicant assails the order dated 11.9.2014 passed by the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Raipur, in Criminal Case No.14121/14.
2. When the passed over case is called out for hearing in second round, none present for the applicant. No representation is made.
3. In absence of any representation on behalf of the applicant, no option except to dismiss the revision is left to this Court.
4. Consequently, the revision is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Sd/-
(Sanjay K. Agrawal)
JUDGE
B/-
Shankar S/o Shri Dulal Daloi
State Of Chhattisgarh
Sanjay K. Agrawal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
