The High Court of Chhattisgarh dismissed a petition under Section 482 CrPC for want of prosecution after the petitioners failed to appear or file representations despite multiple calls.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
.•i;.->.--~~-.--.i.«.s's--—n??t= ;&3s:sas--i~s'3'?5;s;^a-;''-s;^^E^^^^^^ ^^^gsss5e-£-7
('O'O) JndsBijg-^ouzsia 'HBM^O^ Ai.iQ-uop'B^g sonod 'jnds'epg 'p'eoy u'eqnqp'ei^ ' U'BMIJ, 'BJpuaAiqg 'BqpBjnuv jo jai.qSn'ep U'BMIJ,
•e
(•O'O) JndgBiig -^OU^SIQ 'T^BM^O^ A^TQ-UOp'B^g 3:>II°d '^nds'Biig 'pi3oy u'eqnqp'B]^ 'U^ATJ^M JO ^USpTSSJ BJpUSAiqg •JQ 9JTM U-BMTJ, B]:iqsng jo
'^•e
('O'O) JndsBng-^u^siQ 'jnds'B^ig 'I^M^O^ X^iQ.uoii.B^.g '-isoiJJO soiiod ssnou uopB^g sq^ qgnojq^ 'qjBSsi^sqqo jo s^B^g
•T sxNaaNOdsaH
•^
snsyaA
(•0-0) JndsBiig -^OU^STQ 'TIBM^O>I ^13-UOI^^g 33II°d '^ndsB{ig 'pBoy waqnvjpvy^ ''ep'eg 'eSjna jo ^uspissj 'sj'eaX gg ^noqB p3§B 'aq'BAvqsn^ {'B]:nqyBM jo uos Bq'BMqsn^} ^oqsy @ lUB^n'Bg
('O'O) ^ndsBng -^OU^SIQ 'T''BM^O^ X:I3-UOI:'B^g 'jnds^iig 'pLreq^XBQ soipd ''BJ'ed'BAV'B^ JO ^UOpISSJ 'SJBSX g£ ^noq'B p9§B 'BUJJ'B51BM.L[ST^\ pBSBJJ m-ey jo uos •eiujB?['eMqsi/^ iissuiBy ^
^s^
•e •s^
y
-J^A
if€y'l'.^
'71.
^
syaNouuad
^TOZJO^^'ON •d-KrHO (•o'o) un<ISv^Ia
ivHyvosLLj.vHHojozanocHioiHaia.NOH SHA NI
^
PETITION UNDER SECTIQN 482 OF THB CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE 1973
Crime No. 40/2010
Arising out of order jiated 25.04.2X)13 passed in Criminal Case No. 20/2011 by the leamed Judicial Magistrate First Class, Bilaspur (C.G.) (Annexure A/l),<^ the petitioners niost respectfully prefer this petition on the following facts and grounds :
a»B
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
Order Sheet
CR.M.P.No. 185 of 2015
Versus
......Respondents.
11/09/20- None for the petitioners.
Ms. M. Asha, PLforthe State.
No one appears nor any representation is made on
behalf of the petitioners even in the second call, therefore, the
|Court has no option except to dismiss the petition for want of
prosecution.
Accordingly, the petition is dismissed for want of
prosecution.
Sd/-
Goutam Bhaduri
Judge
balram
Ramesh Vishwakarma
Saulani @ Ashok Kushwaha
State Of Chhattisgarh
Sushila Tiwari
Anuradha Tiwari
Goutam Bhaduri
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
