Appeal dismissed for want of prosecution as the appellant failed to appear on two occasions when the matter was called.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
FA No. 100 of 2013
• Ramswarup Vishwakarma S/o Late Budhram Vishwakarma Aged About 47 Years R/O
Kalmitar, P.S. Ratanpur, Distt. Bilaspur C.G.
---- Appellant
Versus
1. Rajkumar Viswakarma S/o Avadh Ram Viswakarma R/O Kalmitar, P.S. Ratanpur, Distt.
Bilaspur C.G.
2. State Of Chhattisgarh Thru- Collector, Bilaspur C.G.
---- Respondents
10/09/2015 None for the appellant.
Ms. Farah Minhaz, PL for the State.
The matter was called twice on both the occasions none
appeared for the appellant. This Court is left with no other
option, but to dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution.
Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for want of
prosecution.
Sd/-
(Goutam Bhaduri)
Judge
Kamde
Ramswarup Vishwakarma
Rajkumar Viswakarma
State of Chhattisgarh
Goutam Bhaduri
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
