In a contempt petition alleging non-compliance with an order dated 22.12.2014, the High Court found no willful disobedience. The court dropped the petition following a representation filed by the respondent, noting some delay in its considerations.
The contempt petition was dropped against the respondent.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
Contempt Case (Q.No. f^^L /2015
PETITIONER Smt. Lilavati Painkra W/o Shri Chandra Vijay Sai, aged about 28 years at present working as Assistant Teacher (Panchayat), G Primary School Bodokachhar Janpad Panchayat Kunkuri .^ Dist. Jashpur R/o R.D.A. .^^^^ Colony Tikrapara Police Station Kunkuri Civil & Revenue Jashpur (C.G.) Yersus RESPONDENT I.P. Mourya present working as Chief Executive officer Jila Panchayat Jashpur Dist. Jashpur (C.G.) CONTEMFT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 215 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA
-MC--78
"Sw-i *%tpTtdP?, ^^rftWTg, f^<HI<.|i^<
WR^T $h^l^.... .G??^::.. .V^x.C.. .^ 2 o i
SIT^I ^3RR (3E^^°4 )
|3Tm^T7^te
Wt3TI^^%|?<CTW irftHs^r
^BrRURTBLl: MR.JUS IICb S
06.04.2015:|ANJAY K. AGRAWAt:
^i^T(>i41^^wcft^ F^<<f| <Ri<dj<
^^TffW^I|
|---|---|---|
||Shri AkhileshKumar, lear)
Shri Mateen Siddiqui, lea^
Shri Jai Prakash Mourya
present in person.
|j
•tied counsel forthe petitioner.
|ned counsel for resppndent.
CEO, Zila Panchayat, Jashpur is|
||This contempt petition
herein,
alleging
non-complian|
22.12.2014 passedinWrit Petit|<
Learned counsel for the
in question has been passed
representation has been decid
complying the same.
Fact
remains
that
by
representation has been decid^
C.E.O., Zila Panchayat, Jashpi
Court, no willful dis-obedience
is made out. Accordingly, the <1
the respondent.
i
|(
^t
d
;(
|ias been filed
by the petitioner
|ce
of this
Court's
order
dated
|on(S) No.6650/2014.
respondent submits that the order
>n 19.03.2015 and the petitioner's
^d though there is some delay in
(he written
order,
the
petitioner's
by order dated 19.03.2015 by the
jr. In the considered opinion of this
bfthis Court orderdated 22.12.2014
^ontempt petition is dropped against
Sd/-
SanjayK. Agrawal
Judge|
2 issues framed by the court
Whether there is willful disobedience of the court order dated 22.12.2014 by the respondent.
Whether the contempt petition should be proceeded with despite the passing of a supplementary representation.
Smt. Lilavati Painkra
P. Mourya
Sanjay K. Agrawal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
