A contempt petition under Article 215 and the Contempt of Courts Act was filed alleging non-compliance with a prior order instructing the Union Government to take a decision on the petitioner's case in Brijlal Sharma v. Union of India.
The contempt petition is finally disposed of by the court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
;M ifiii
g" S-fe
^ SHt SSf.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH ATBILASPUR
CONTEMPT CASE(C) N0. ^5^^2014
fi^^i^Ci ^tf^ p p fiH crfd&^ M)t'-~l-~^o]ot^^ in ^-P.p//vo ^lfl^f^l^- ^wsL^P^s^ ^ Lt^^t i^'^Z"^ APPLICANT Jwala Prasad Sharma, son of "^^ (Petitionerl late Sukharu Prasad Sharina, aged about 74 years, R/o. Vivekanand Ward No.3, Mahasainund, Police Station, Civil and Revenue .-•l^1,.,^^s ,.y^ District Mahasamund (C.G.),
V;
THE CONTEMFT OF COURTS ACT FOR INITIATING OF
CONTEMFT PROCEEDINGS
^
/<•»•-~-1 ' -:" ^ f:. i/ y..-. 1 ^ &-<-^^3 ^ ^fc-Xl-BG—PS
^
's'sst ^iraiptq, »Tl1'tf'is, Rirtio<i<
MM<?i 1 SbHI 4) ..^B<'i 1. £*t3.SC..
^.^^Zftl^
sn^g ww (^iga^p)
| an^gga t^^TI^.sR |
R-ii* CHS |
®RiIW^^a3'I^t | +i^iipi4i;iyw?n'^f^^<r3f<d.« ^gftfflan^ |
|---|---|---|---|
| SB:HON'BLE SHRI SANJAYK 01.04.2015 |
AGRAWAL, J |
||
| Shri Shivang Dubey, Shri Rakesh Jha, cov This court by order State Govt. to .consider light of decisipn passed India & Others and suhinit of India^ for consideratio This contempt peti-tj non-compliance 6f order Respondent N0.1&2 h |
inter aiia thaf inguiry Secrefeary, Ministry of memo dated 12.03.2015 fori with law. Hot d |
||
| Be that as it may, Union of India will take with law as directed by t |
|||
| With the aforesaid |
observation, the conte.mpt |
||
| indej | petitionstands .finally d |
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the contempt petition maintains itself in light of the compliance of the prior order dated 10.12.2010.
Whether the applicant's allegation of non-compliance is substantiated for initiating contempt proceedings.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Brijlal Sharma v. Union of IndiaReferred
Brijlal Sharma v. Union of India
State of India & OthersReferred
State of India & Others
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Jwala Prasad Sharma
Nidhi Chibber
Dr. Rohit Yadav
Sanjay K. Agrawal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
