Curia Held the writ petition filed by a retired assistant teacher regarding pension has become infructuous and accordingly dismissed.
The instant writ petition has been dismissed as having become infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
f.
•^-
ji'^^'Ei ^
^'^^
^>
INTHE HiGHCOUlCTOF^HKU^T^lSGARH.AT-BlLASPUR o WRIT RETITION CS1 N0. OF 2008
PEtITIONER : 7^ t.VenkaiyYa, aged - 65 years S/6 Shri T. Papaiyya 1
^^^?-
- .^vfe'€^^.
''jy^'StS^"'..-^"'
^l
^^r^iy'^
?^-1'"^"....--:"
Retired Assista.nt Teacher,
From- Rrimary School, Chandangiri, Bloek- Bhopatpattanam; DistriCt - Beejapur (C. G.) R/Q Village -GullapGtta, P. O.—ChandangiFi, : Tehsil - Bhopaipatfaham, i Disti-iGt- Bgejapur (C. G.),
VERSUS
RESRONDENTS : 1. Accountant General Qf C. G. Th rou g li - The Sen i o rAccoy nts Qffi ce r, Chhattisgarh, Raipur(C. G.) ^2. Blocfc Edueation OffiGer, Tribal Development Block- • BhQpalpatfanam, . DistriGt -Beejapur(C. G.) I', ^T^
Writ Petitioh sUJ^dieri^AFtiitle'i-s^ZSiltit.COMisitituti'cM liliBiitlila!
'S^ '^(PITcTZT, ®t)ly<|(o,fs(diy^< <11CII tfiqTcRw%"-^f-©--(r^i-4&^Ti^ 200
STT^T T5R7 (1I?f3^T)
sn^r^ifnw S
TCTTOCdft^STf^I WlfePfrl •WRff <f ft^t tfW^
ns;ff 3iT^?i'^7tfl^f
^r sifim aig?r
4.7.2014:-
Shri RK Kesharwani, counse for the petitioner.
Shri R. Pradhan, counsel for|'respondent No. 1.
Shri S Majid Ali, PL for respo| ident No.2.
Learned counsel for the pe<litioner would submit that the instant
writ petition has become infruGtuou^.
It is accordingly dismissed a^ , having become infructuous.
Sd/-
Ban/e _.
Pras^iuxnarM^8
Judge
^-
tfss^.-.
«•
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition has become infructuous.
T. VenkaiyYa
Accountant General of C.G.
Block Education Officer, Tribal Development Block
Prashant Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
