Punit Ram Sahu v. State of Chhattisgarh and Ors.

Chhattisgarh HC3 Jul 2014WPS/550/2008

Case brief

from the order text

COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (CG) WRIT…

AI extract

Issue for consideration

Whether the writ petition seeking to quash the promotion order affecting the petitioner's graded list can be allowed.

Punit Ram Sahu Vs State of Chhattisgarh… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Chhattisgarh HC (2014)

mfaaw m m	mmm	$mka¢=iWWW ^{ii fT§CJ§} ^Ifmgu *1 311%]? Mrivl
	SB : Hon’ble Shri Prasha 3-7-2014 Heard Shri Adltya Shri Akhllesh Kumar Pa Petitioner has p direction to the responde (Annexure P/5 andthe Annexure — P/5 beneficiaries of the sai however, the petitioner; respondents in the preser It is well settied passed against persons litigation. (See: ^{Ranjan K} reported in 2014 AIR SC already been retired from persons ^{to the}post ^{of Ne} the gradation list. in the In view of the e promotion ^{does not surviv} Accordingly, the wr	nt Kumar Mishra J. e Khare Advocate for the petitioner and l Lawyer for the State. ferred this writ petition seeking a ts to quash the order dated 30 12-2006 gradation