In a writ petition challenging the cancellation of a police transfer order before its implementation, the High Court dismissed the petition, noting no case for interference in the administrative decision.
The writ petition was dismissed. The petitioner is directed to move a representation to the concerned authority if grievances persist.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
i^ oiisys'
IN THE HI&H COURT OF CHHATn:S6ARH AT BILASPUR
o WRIT PETITEON fS) N0. ->° OF 2014
PETTTEQNER
Sunil Kumar Ekka S/o. Nikodin Ekka, aged about 40 years, Occupation - Constable, Posted at Police Station - Mirtur. Civil & Revenue Distt. Bijapur (C.6.)
VERSUS
ESPON5ENTS
^^
-i-H^ 2.
v
•o'
3.
State of Chhattisgarh through the Secretary, Home Department, AAantralQyu, AAahanadi Bhawan New Raipur, bistt. Raipur (C.6.)
E>irector fieneral of Police and President, Stute Poliee Establishment Board; Police Headquarter, Chhattisgarh. Raipur, District Raipur (C&)
Superintendent of Police Bi, bistt. Bijapur (C.6.)
WRIT PETETION UNbER ARTECLE 226 OF THE
CONSITTTUTEON OF INDIA
p-
H1GH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR
WRIT PETITION ?S) N0.3011 OF_2QU
PETITIONER
Sunil Kumar Ekka
Versus
RESPONDENTS
State of Chhattisgarh & Others
(Writ Petition underArticle 226 ofthe Constitution of India)
Single Bench : Hon'ble Shri Prashant Kumar Mishra, J.
Present:Shri Avinash Singh, Advocate for the petitiorier.
Shri Sangarh Pandey, Dy. Govt. Advocate for the State.
ORDER rOPEN COURT)
(Passed on this 8th day of July, 2014) ; I
Heard learned counsel for the parties.
Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed. However, if the petitioner moves a representation raising his grievances before the concerned authority, the same shall be considered and decided as eariy as possible. ___.
sd/'/Prashant Kuaiar Mishra Judge
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the High Court should interfere in an administrative order cancelling a transfer that was cancelled before it could be acted upon.
Sunil Kumar Ekka
State of Chhattisgarh through the Secretary, Home Department
Director General of Police and President, State Police Establishment Board
Superintendent of Police Bijapur
Prashant Kumar Mishra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
