Single Judge held that as the petitioner's salary and designation issues are pending before the Supreme Court under SLP No. 1.1088/2006, this Court should not pass any order and disposed of the writ petition.
The writ petition was disposed of without passing any order on the subject matter.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
/^^
^ »8S.ESB^s
^p [ff^J^ /-
BEFORE THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (CHHATTISGARH)
W.P. (S} No:J-<%3 of 2010
PETITIONER
Dharam Lal Yadav, S/o Shri Pyare Lal Yadav, Lecturer, R/o Ware hlouse Road, Near Nowa Office Bilaspur, Distt. Bilaspur (C.G.)
VERSUS
RESPONDENTS ^, 1) State of Chhattisgarh
.^^^
-^^^
..^'.^c^y'''
^y" ^^"k..--"''
y ^: 2)
,,^^^%%^
s^ys^ ^
ll>^-^j
Y^-^ 3S^,^ ^] , 3)
''^.
Through-The Secretary Urban Administration and Development Department, D.K.S. Bhawan Raipur, Distt. Raipur (C.G.)
Municipal Corporation Bilaspur, Through-Commissioner Municipal Corporation, Bilaspur, Distt. Bilaspur (C.G.)
Deputy Commissioner, Municipal Corporation, Bilaspur, Distt. Bilaspur (C.G.)
WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIAFOR ISSUANCE OF WRIT OR MANDAMUS/DIRECTION OF OTHER APPROPRIATE WRIT.
°\ >
^^^^^ ^^-^^ "^ '^ ^ J"'-,€ •^1§.^; 1
^
i^ ^,^^'
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR
W.P.fS^No.1003 of 2010
PETITIONER Dharam Lal Yadav
Versus
ESPONDENTS State of Chhattisgarh & others.
Single Bench : Hon'ble Shri Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra
Present:Shri Ajay Shrivastava, counsel fcr the petitioner. Shri Bhaskar Payashi, Panel Lawyer for the. State.
Shri B.L. Sahu, counsel for respondents No.2 & 3.
ORAL ORDER
(Passed on this 7th day of July, 2014)
Heard learned counsel for the parties.
v. Kavita Tiwari & anothei}.
^o 5
Sd/-
^
Prashant Kumar Mishra Judge
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a writ petition challenging the re-designation of an employee can be decided while a related matter is pending as a special leave petition before the Supreme Court.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Municipal Corporation, Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh v. Kavita Tiwari & anotherReferred¶35
Municipal Corporation, Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh v. Kavita Tiwari & another (SLP No. 1.1088/2006)
Dharam Lal Yadav
State of Chhattisgarh
Municipal Corporation Bilaspur
Deputy Commissioner, Municipal Corporation, Bilaspur
Prashant Kumar Mishra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
