Dismissed

Jeevesh Sharma v. State Of Chhattisgarh and Ors.

Chhattisgarh HC9 Sept 2014WPC/330/2014

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In W.P.(C) No. 356/2014, the petitioner challenged the lack of proper compensation disclosure by the Municipal Council. The court observed that the Corporation had assisted the petitioner's understanding but no specific order was made against the respondents in this excerpt. The petition was adjourned for the petitioner to approach the Corporation for proper compensation.

What did the court decide?

Petition adjourned for petitioner to approach Corporation for proper compensation details.

Jeevesh Sharma Vs State Of Chhattisgarh and Ors. — Land Acquisition | Chhattisgarh HC (2014)

¶1

BEFORE THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHAmSGARH AT BILASPUR

¶2

W.P.(C)NO. 356/2014

¶3

PETITIONER

¶4

Jeevesh Sharma, aged about 42 years, son ofShri Prem Raj Sharma, Auto-part Dealer resident of Ward No. 11, Ktllapara, Khairagarh, Distt. Rajnandgaon (C.G.)

¶5

VERSUS

¶6

RESPONDENTS

¶7

State of Chhattisgarh, through the Secretary, Department of Town and Country Planning, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, New Rafpur (C.G.)

¶8

...--••"^' ^^^^•2. Cottector, Rajnandgaon(CG) ^^^iS.... 3. 'Superintendent of Potice, Rajnandgaon, Distt. Rajnandgaon ;

¶9

Municipal Council, Khairagarh, through - the Chief Municipat Officer, Dtstt. Rajnandgaon (CG) 5, Tahsildar, Khairagarh, District - Rajnandgaon (CG)

¶10

¶11

WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF 1 NDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF WRIT OF CERTIORARI OR ANY OTHER APPROPRIATE WRIT OR DIRECTION OR ORDER AS THE FACTS OF THE CASE WARRANT

¶12

¶13

xes. stXI-HC—78
/f~~%
{? "9 S
"-'ia.K %^?F^'

¶14

'3:5ET rt<iqi0<), yTfltf'K,, f^dl'dy

¶15

^mc-rr ^i^^.^f^^33°^^201

¶16

		CT^Tqsre ( '^flytEl)
	sn^^tR-fi* W?T3TT^T3WRi	^aiw?if?asii^i	*i'Iih<fl-iKititfl'Sfeitfl •iRi'(<ii< ^i%Rm3ir^i
;^'-t	K	: Hcni'hleSh"Manlndra Mohan Shri Shashi BhushanTi^ri, Shri Safeh Gupta, 6 itetefrespmdente No. 12,3 &5. c awa!, coun: bf At the outeet, it is submitted i the respmdent-CorpOTation has ass< thepetiiioner; detalsofwhich,has In wew of disdosure of stat^ petitioner seeks to wttidraw tfiis p^ revivs, in case, grievanceisnotredr^ Accordingly;ttiepetitim is ^sa •*<	t>unsejforthepelitioner. tverninent Ajvocate cen hs r tition -' lel for respondent No.4/ Munidpal lat during ttie pendency ofpetitim; ^edtopaypropercompaisaiionto madeinthereply. iment, the learned counsei for die itition, at ttiis stage, witti llberty to ft,nd<a^swl'B> ludy ,tava

Jeevesh Sharma v. State Of Chhattisgarh and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Jeevesh Sharma v. State Of Chhattisgarh and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Smt. Kishori Devi and Ors. Vs State and Others

Kailash Nath Sharma Vs The State Of Chhattisgarh and Ors.

Mehoob Ahmed Vs Bhilai Steel Plant and Ors.

Bodhiram and Anr. Vs the Sub Divisional Officer and Ors.

Mohnish Kumar Gabel Vs State Of Chhattisgarh

Surendra Sharma Vs State Of Chhattisgarh and Ors.