Partly allowed

Sukhiram and Ors. v. State Of Chhattisgarh and Ors.

Chhattisgarh HC1 Sept 2014WPC/1602/2014

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This writ petition challenged a final notification for village amalgamation issued without inviting objections. The court directed the competent authority to invite objections via public notice within 15 days, consider them, and then pass a final decision before issuing a final notification.

What did the court decide?

The writ petition was disposed off with a direction that the Competent Authority shall invite objections through public notice within 15 days from the date of publication of notice; such objections sh

Sukhiram and Ors. Vs State Of… — Public Procurement and Tenders | Chhattisgarh HC (2014)

¶1

IN THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (C.G.) Writ Peiintto (C) No. ML of 2014 & w @mM» W» Wu

¶2

PETITIONERS

¶3

¶4

Sukhiram son of late Milap Ram Kanwar, aged about 62 resident of Village— years, Nawagaron, Kothitola, Police Station—Bagnadi, Tahsil and P.S.—Dongargarh, DistrictRajnandgaon (C.G.) Premlal son of late Milan Kanwar, aged about 42 years, resident of Village-Nawagaron, Kothitola, Police Station— Bagnadi, Tahsil and P.S.Dongargarh, DistrictRajnandgaon (C.G.)

¶5

Sarvevali son of late Sukhdev Kanwar, aged about 59 years, resident of Village—Nawagaron, Kothitola, Police Station— Bagnadi, Tahsil and P.S.Dongargarh, DistrictRajnandgaon (C.G.)

¶6

Dilip son of late Tijau Kanwar, aged about 45 years, resident of Village-Nawagaron, Kothitola, Police Station-Bagnadi, Tahsil and P.S.—Dongargarh, District— Rajnandgaon (C.G.)

¶7

RESPONDENTS

¶8

:1. State of Chhattisgarh, through the Secretary, Panchayat and Rural Development Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, New Raipur (C.G.) 2. The Collector, Rajnandgaon, District- Rajnandgaon (C.G.) 3. The Sub—Divisional Officer Rajnandgaon, (Revenue), District— Rajnandgaon (C.G.)

¶9

226 OF^THE ‘ WRIT PETITION^UNDERARTICLE

M x mm «m m w

m w w \ “mm

\Qf

.l ééQ/ W‘Qn QC/M HWO WW mm (Wgmi

¶14

WWWW amwé‘am	mwmaxré‘z:	WW ^{111W? ii mg? {WEE} ‘ %Wam
	SB: Hon’ble ^{Shri Manindra;} 01-09-20 ¹⁴ Shri Anup ^Majumdar, Shri Prafull Bharat, Shri Satish ^{Gupta, Govt. Ad} Heard.	^{Mohan Shrivastava, J.} counsel for ^thepetitioner/ ^s. Additional Advocate General with vocate for ^{the State.}
	In this writ reorganization/ ^amalgamatic impugned Notiflcation, res" proposal ^{under the} first N< the fmal ^{Notification Withou‘} been urged ^{that without inv} has been ^issued. Without entering ^into Additional ^Advocate ’Generz Competent ^Authority shall amalgamation/ ^{re-organizatj} impugned final Notification objections ^{of the}petitioners interested, ^{a final decision s} In view ^{of such statei} Advocate ^{General, learned} that this petition ^{may be di} in the light ^{of statement ma} State.	i ^{sposed off with appropriate direction} ^{de before the Court on behalf of the} petition, challenge to in of villages by issuance of :s mainly on the ground that the )tification ^{has been changed under} t inviting ^{any objections. It has also} iting any ^{objection, final Notification} other aspects ^{of the matter, learned} 11‘ submits that in this matter, the invite objections ^{afresh against the} on of villages as stated in the and only ^{upon considering} all the and such ^otherpersons ^{as may be} hall be taken. nent so made ^{by learned Additional} :ounsel ^{for the}petitioner/s ^submits

W29

Wm (Waau)

WWW‘ mmm	WWW ”gr	%5 aim swim
“‘txmane	Considering the subn fmally disposed off with Authority shall invite the o submission of the objections date of publication of notic petitioners ^{and other object} appropriate decision shall ^b and, thereafter, a final Notifi‘ With the aforesaid 0t finally disposed ^off.	Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Judge lissions made, this writ petition is a direction that the Competent bjections through public ^notice for Within a period of 15 days ^{from the} :e. The objection submitted by the ars, if any, shall be considered and a i taken by the Competent ^Authority ication may be issued. servation/direction, the petition is Sd/-

Sukhiram and Ors. v. State Of Chhattisgarh and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sukhiram and Ors. v. State Of Chhattisgarh and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Chamra Ram Yadav Vs State Of Chhattisgarh and Ors.

Balidas Berwanshi Vs State Of Chhattisgarh and Anr.

Jaganu Ram Sahu Vs Chhattisgarh Madhyamik Shiksha Mandal

Shyam Kumar Gujrati Vs Board of Revenue,M.P. Ors.

Mangni Vs State Of Chhattisgarh And Ors.

Balchand Oswal And Ors. Vs State Govt.of Chhattisgarh And Ors.