The High Court of Chhattisgarh, in a second appeal under Section 100 CPC, dismissed the plaintiff's appeal for want of prosecution, finding that the appellant failed to appear or prosecute the matter.
Appeal dismissed for want of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
^
IN THE, HIGH COURT QF JLTDICATURE CHHATHSGARH AT BJLASPUR SECOND APPEA:LN'0'5^/ 2004 Slni ie Bs
,A@pellant (Plamtiff)
»Hiralal Gupta S/o Bhajorain Gupta Aged ahout 62 years Occupation Business R/o Baniyapara, Raigarh
Dist: RaigaTb-(C.G.)
. ^u^ ISTaiTay Ua1il?-a D/-it<ic<1-i.^r1 'Drtinm.fln
yy^ceRespaadeat K.n.1 - Munielpal C®rp»ratl«a, tfareugia .lits connaiss.I.aner Ra.i.sarb 1C.G.)
i6
^l^g^S.S..".i3BB-<~-ara7—'i<;ui^yja-; ^gp&ab®t40 years, _8/0i;Smfl|n Colorry, TCa@ihi»iofi, Chakradhar Nagar, Ralgarli. Dist: Raigarh-(C.G.)
Statte of - M.P. Now State of 'Birough Clihattisgarh fhe CoHeetor (Nazul), Raigarh,
Disfc: Ralgarh-fC.G.)
SECOND APPEAL U/S 100 OF'mE CQDE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE
<br>^
IN THE HIGH COURT OE JUDICATURE CHHATHSGARH AT BHASPUR
SECOND APPEAt NO?'^/ 2004 SJRi isBs
iAEpeUant (Plaintifi)
Dist: Raigarb-fC.G.)
VCTSUS
3', Rpsnondp.nts
AmarlalTalreja S/Q pisndulal Talreja, A^(^ab^a.t40years, .R/^Smffia Colony, Kai&fahiiKhoB,
Chakrsidhar Nagar,
Ralgarli, Dist: Raigarh-fC.G.)
i Sta.is of - M.P. Now State of «!• Chhattisgarh Through fhe CoBeetor (Nazul), Raigarh,
«!•
Dist: Raigarh-fC.G.)
^ SECOND APPEAL U/S 100 OF THE CQDE OF CIVIL PRQCEDURE
;—78
-3^3i ^w^. grfiy'Ko, Ri^i+iy
^2.
Tffff^V"*ifl'%
.SA....^.-:t.3..).<?..4. 'Wt 20
M^T TR^ (yf^g^T)
| ^iPIRTOt'l'I?re-ff 'Etfe^l <f'n<<l'< 'SR aTfgii »rrc;7i |
||
|---|---|---|
| tyl^ ^u- ;^.J^,^ ?^ ^i iiesnn sar '^..:i;^^^^*i ;,:«:„;;y»c OTefortheappel |
iMateen Sidd ysNO:.1" ^-^- .sy.^^tiSSt-^''^1—1^?-- -_;-L.a ^st3ffi,^Pin PunJabi;. •i-s ry»?.'>....?"%t*-I<j? 5tf•' 3*?-?H*&. ,-..„,..--^^ >taWr®o'dhdentNo.3 :~Sis..f»:'<w-t• .— -3%^^anjeev Agr fV^ '^ "^J^- |
n*in the sec< appetiantaF'herefore, In >vts! •WaSI',Mi»t Accordinaiv. the •fS prosecuiion. other buttodismis |
| ,s^v '£-• |
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the appeal filed under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure should be allowed or dismissed.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Hiralal Gupta
Amarlal Talreja
State of Chhattisgarh
Sanjay K
A. Agrawal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
