Mohar Mati and Others v. Sonau and Others
Case brief
What is this about?
HH? 1RT F‘ I) AT RE IVAH’ 17XH%UH7 ATBILASP…
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
‘
éf
f $ m
L
’
I iqHE£H HH? 1RT F‘ I) AT RE IVAH’ 17XH%UH7
ATBILASP
3 0)
s.A. N .................. 2001
APPLICANTS . Moharmati aged abOugt 50 years
Defeudants Joharmati aged about 48 years
gr torl aged about 45 yeara
¢
Mantorl aged about 42 years
;V“
arr aaughters of Itwarl Sahu R/o Vll—
lage Pandrlpanl Tahs1l Bllalgarh Dlstt
Ralpur (CG)
VERSUS
é onau'son of‘Aghori Sahu aged
RESPbNDENTs rabout 60 years
vPlaihtiff 2. Phirat‘son of Aghori Sahu aged
‘;§
\«” about 50 years
$
‘ .f 3 ran son of AghoriVSahu aged
f?“
o out 49 years
P atharln Bal D/o Aghori Sahu
f
.E vagedrabout 42 years
%;d1
WTlharln Bal D/o Aghorl Sahu aged
about 5O years
All resident of Govindvan Tahsi Bilaigarh
Dlstto/Ralpur CGV
Defendants NO 5 lshram son of Itwarl Sahu aged abou t
4O years
tate of Chhattlsgarh Through
Colector Ralpur
Memorandum of Second Appeal U/s 100 of
Code of C1v11 Procedure
cwm Vamaal ak‘Lowawk—swg
dam vauwk. s New saws“ ,x
‘3CW Gesmw ‘mf’rk o)
temxrf Aeckecwws o
Veuee4‘a<:y“=qppe340Mxvr3N a43Jm,‘csV,j)
<L§tw“y¢2¥d¢;1nugsa «wwwaMeA baisx%$\Q¢¢huap~‘£g
m 13 contd...2..
mwgammgt
sWQivlo! m 20
| mm (W | ) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| WWW | $WRW$= | Iynm‘i if fgnai W311 a: arm arm |
|
| ‘é +31 |
Evga‘; in ihe gel; ag§a§§ani3 Thamfam, in giher agiian ism. is. éissmia Amarijingiy; ihE. gragagajimn. Mama f9§t§§g agpeli E S ; Emghie Ehé Eaag |
m: Mimi 532 girwm iEe appaai ms. ppeai is .w 1% §2f§g ? £ |
wing aggaagzii tr m5 iangaa, ihéi‘a Emir: hai: “r farwant a? gmsaauiiaa Sd/- ‘ Sanjay K. Agrawal Judge {I w" éiiamisseé far wag‘gt Q? ‘ v§ |
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Chhattisgarh HC
- Decided on
- · April
- Registered
- Case no.
- SA/309/2001
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court