Single judge of the Allahabad High Court dismissed an appeal filed under Section 100 CPC, noting the appellant had no instructions and was not present, recording that the case was devoid of a basis for hearing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
| IN THE HIGH ( SECONO |
COURT AWE |
O AL |
F 3UBICATURE AT 3_ABAL'PUR, n.'P. SO. J2^2-- OF 1938 ) .t;:;,,-?^ ^ ;^i, 'i.4 |
|---|---|---|---|
| flppellant | S -/ |
Su Ad HI Dur |
rya Kant Tluarl, son of Shri ltya Oev Tiuari, resldBnt of G-11,Hudco, Bhllal, Olstrict g. |
| Versus | |||
| Respondents | : | 1. | Smt Bina alias Sanju Tlaarl, resldent; of Tripathl Nluas, Naya Para, Tlturcllh, Durg. |
| 2. | The State af Madhya Pradesh. Through i The Collector, ourg, n.p. |
Appeal Under Sectlon 100 of the Code of CivllProcedure V-^/ '>A '/2<s. ^<»<?-D^>
^)i.v^:A XEqs—78 ii ••'.;? X<i\ '^'y' ,a ,y\
TSvf "q|A|!0<), ^rfRPTS, fsK4]yy
.Sfi:..J.^.^.
tffff<;n' '^iW-s
~2A )
an^?r ira% (ycif^gEr)
^lfidl'l-l tTTO.-ff tt fS^t 'rT-iP^
t^l l<-li«b
St^lld) ^tHWHfttT 31^1 -S SffgiT aIR-1
Shri Anii Pandwj lesmsd coynss! for
^llr:n
sut)mlts tnst ns iias no Ifistnjctions IR th9 iTiatt9f.
aDosa! is dismisssd-
Sd/-
Sanjay K. Agrawal
Judge
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the appeal filed under Section 100 CPC should be allowed or dismissed.
Whether the appellant has any instructions or merits to pursue the appeal.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Surendra Kant Taudiary
Smt Bina alias Sanju Taudiary
The State of Madhya Pradesh
Sanjay K. Agrawal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
