Jay Ram and Others v. Samaru Ram and Another
Case brief
What is this about?
a ^i'.-^^;K^^^iS?^^^!^'^? :."'-i"-;^'' n ,:…
a ^i'.-^^;K^^^iS?^^^!^'^? :."'-i"-;^'' n ,:…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
fc-i'i.1? ^"^;H;?%a^i'.-^^;K^^^iS?^^^!^'^? :."'-i"-;^''
n
,:a,»4
IN THB HIGH CODRT OF JUDICATURE,M.P. AT JAAPUR Second Appeal No. )90_2._ of 1998. (Second Appeal 0:nder__ SectiOR 100 of ttae C.P.C.) APEELLAHTS: 1. Jay Ram S/o Manglu, EiB5SI@OTT aged about 40 years. 2. Radhdshyam S/o Manglu, aged about 38 years. 5. Bala S/o Manglu,aged about 56 years-Cast-Sahu, 4. Uttaa S/o Manglu,aged aboat 34 years. 5. Narbadia Bai,B/o Not known Wd/o Hanglu Sabu, All ca st-Satau,Occupation-Cultivator all r/o Village Bagtarai, Tebsil Dhamtari, Qtstt.Raipur,(H.P.), Vs. RBSPONHEMT: 1. Saaaru Raa S/o Hshtar, ^- aged 50:ysars, Caste-Baya(Mahar) Kotwar, R/o Village-Bagtarai, Tebsil & Di.stt. Gbamtari,-{M.P.). RESPONQENT> .2: 2. State of N.P. EEFENDANT: Tbroagb: The Colleetor, Di.stt. Bhamtari, (Old Distt. Raipur). VALUATION COIMT FBES Valued at &.2386»20/- only te.260/- StS affixed
!<%
-'.'^' ^,.
-^^^'
l-i-^1'^1"..^ ,e
_ taa !aaui»tB
'^».
*A
a/jlc—78
ls^"
•K\
3^cTr^w^. tfT.Fi^'ie, fsirti^y
~~>.
ja-.<?.?;..!.M
sn^y ifRe (
•tITO-fl tf fs^ TTW.iTt
BI^T ^SI '?<;•<!'+.
if; sjfgq »rr<?i
;'^7 SU^T ?bF[T^)
J.
.3 ^n-.-
sj'-^.y B^.
appeisanis- i nereTore, !R iiiiese circumstances. this Court has no
othsr ODtion but to dlsmJs^ ttie ftir want af nmei:!niitinn
AGGOrQlftyiV\ ?rl§ ^00631 IS dlSITilSS&'l f0r V^Ht
^sss.^^
Sd/-
Sanjay K. Agrawal
Judge
Jay Ram
Radhdshyam
Bala
Uttaa
Narbadia Bai
Saru Rai
Sanjay K. Agrawal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court