Dismissed
Smt.Marisha Mishra v. L.I.C.of India and Others
Chhattisgarh HCFA/158/2002
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
; HI8H_.GOSffi ' 5?' 'SHBKTTTSGAaH -£~S '•M…
What the court decided
AI extract
; HI8H_.GOSffi ' 5?' 'SHBKTTTSGAaH -£~S '•M…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
&
-C4)-
c ^\h)^
IBT THB' HOH«Bte ; HI8H_.GOSffi ' 5?' 'SHBKTTTSGAaH '•M "arusptEt -£~S maa :; iPp'BAl, ».———.--/adE^ A Bl.LAWS VTSS'STSFS 1« , ,SBt. Marlsba tttsfara,
maa :; iPp'BAl, ».———.--/adE^
VTSS'STSFS 1« , ,SBt. Marlsba tttsfara, aged 29 .y&ara, ' . wlf®®flatft Shri Saajay Klsfara, oesi^a-fclea ua^Bple^df 2. Ktaart Sal'rta Mlstoa, aggd at preseat2 joars, dasgSber ®flats Sbrl SaB^a? Misbra, alaer, ttoreagh ber : ^ mtaral gBsrdiaa, aotfeeri tlte BSS* .:; frlgad »Snt. Maylste Klshra vlfg e: Isb^ Shrl Sa&.jlayMlshra, 1 Botb rgsldcHfcs of "saaiBltra" •^^^GiTi.l Ia.Ke, ,%rhatihata Bllasipar, taiasil A dlstrlet Bllaspar ( Gtohattisgarli ) 7 3S_a'S"U_S
li: ''
^ 1. Llfe Insaraaee cerporafeiaa of ladla, •fcia?©Bgfa th^ Brasofa Maaag*r, Braneh at Kortia, tahsil & dlstri.et; Kerba ( Ghhattlsgarb ), ^2. SatTaa Nlstara, aged 31 7ear8j ^- SOR ef Shri •M.sliBO®BtoagwaR Nishi«» oeeiipatleB J®ear&aa parlsa? 'baslness, reslde&t of " SanBltra " GlTltI.l^ J&rhablaata Bila.^w, tahsil & dlstrlet Bllaspar ( Gfehattlsgarh )
^3' Sat. Sfeantlla1;a Hlshra, ag^d 61 '"year'a, •aife ®fStori. Wste^o Bhagwaa Mlstera, i^sidost of ** Sanaitw"' OlvSl IAu& .Ta.fWblaa-ta, Bllasp'ar, taUsit li&;:. airtrfet :MlagE>ta* (: CWiatMs^a'te^)4
m ^. I ! :IBJ 11 Bi
w Ifl
^. -<'5)ffBSi* 'APPsA&' ' '0N%a S^TTOH 96 ^SEB WITH iaa "^t • 'BTOa'"i' 'o? 'TBB 'coBg^of eilTI. ?B(Sg3p8B3 LLISOS.
-<'5)-
,/' -^)
S^ j "y^ /'<^v
HIGH COURT OFCHHAmSGARH. BILASPUR
SB: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICEe.B.BAJPAI
First APPEAL No. 1'58/2002
Appellants
Smt. MaTishaMishraandanother
Versus
Respondents
Life Insurance Corporation and ors.
Appearance:
Shri Ramkumar Tiwari, Advocate for the appellants. Shri Mukesh Mishra, Advocate for the respondent No. 1. Ku. Sangita Mishra, Advocate, for the respondent No. 2 and 3.
ORDER
(10-11-2014)
Smt. MaTishaMishra and another
Life Insurance Corporation
Satya Nistara
Smt. Santalla Mishra
Chandra Bhushan Bajpai
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court