Third Additional Appeal filed under Section 96 read with Order 41 Rule 1 CPC. Appeal was withdrawn by the appellant. Court dismissed the appeal as withdrawn.
Appeal dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
s
isig
•i
IN THS HIQHi C©tJRT OF tTUBICATUREs AT J^BAI*II(JR 1^3 FIRST APPEMi M© . OP*99
FIRST APPEMi M© .
APPELL^^EiT DEPENDANT No.l l^ Tata Englneering &JLocomotive Co^td^Homi Modl Streefe» 24, >iai Modi Street»F©rt BeE9bay~23<i
^
VERStJS
RESPONBENTSS
Plal^tiff
-X ©EPENDANTNo»l
!• Praiaod K^mar Sli?ighal» 29 years»s/@^ SMvk^narSingfaalt Partxier»Siaghal Tiaperc©Eapaiiy I^iaapfcari ^Mukaa Po st^Iaamtari ©Istt•Raiptar »M«P»
2» M/s» Bhilai Motors. R- p0st Box No» 74» ©+E«"oad Tatibaad, Raipeir, Tata. & distt^Xaiptir^M^JP^
APPEAL ^NBER SECTIOM 96 REAB WITH ©RDER 41 BS3IS 1 OF THEBCIVIL PROCED0RE C0E)E
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH. BILASPUR
m
SB: HON'BLB SHRI JUSTICB C.B. BAJPAI
FIRSTAPPEALNo. 143/1999
Appellant Tata Engineering and Locomotive Company Umit
Versus
Respondents Pramod Kuniar Singhal and another
Appearance:
Shri Vivek Kumar Shrivastava, Advocate for the appellant.
None appears for the respondents.
ORDER
(11-11-2014)
Sd/C.B.Bajpai Judge
?
Tata Engineering and Locomotive Company Limited
Pramod Kumar Singhal
M/s Bhilai Motors
C.B. Bajpai
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
