Disposed
Mohd.irfan And Anr. v. State Of Chhattisgarh
Chhattisgarh HCCRR/213/2014
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR…
What the court decided
AI extract
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
€ [
BEFORE THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF
CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
CRIMINAL REVISION ^(^/2014
t', <?<'
PETITIONERS 1 Mohd. Irfan (Wrongly mentioned ACCUSEDN0.3 as Ilfan) son of Shri Sheikh Habib mentioned as Sheikh (Wrongly N-' Hanib), aged about 38 years, resident of Tekanaka, Kamthi Road, Manav Nagar, Post Jaripatka, nagpur (MH)
ACCUSED N0.4 2.
Mohd.Mustaq, son of Shri Abdul Kadar, aged about 44 years, resident of Itwari, Nagpur, Post Tahsiknaka, Nagpur (MH)
VERSUS
RESPONDENT
State of Chhattisgarh, through the District Magistrate, Rajnandgaon (CG)
CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION UNDER SECTION 397/4f)l CODEOF CRIMINALPROCEbURE, 1973.
^' The petitioners, being aggrie'i/ed by the order passed on '? 07.03.2014^ (ANNEXURE, P-1),,<•° actually [^enewrcedcLti^^l on 11.03.2014, by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Rajnandgaon, in Criminal Case No. .862/2013, State of Chhattisgarh Vs Vijay Kumar Chaturvedi and 05 others, allowing the ^' applicafion filed by the prDsecution U/s. 437(5) Cr.P.C. and
canceling fhe bail grarfted earlier to the petitioners, most humbly and respectfully prefer this revision petition on the
following facts and inter alia on the follo^ing grounds:
'S^ "i||<(lcl<1, E?Ti1tijl<o, 'fe^fTHy
/^ 720/17
<nwn (R<II^»
SVW TR^T ('jqfs'tST)
| 3V^yWft-fi* WI 311^1srii'o |
?^<ITO(^rfOT 311^1 wiferaNwRii4ftiA <r"i<i;i< iraffiiHai^i |
|---|---|
| S.B. Hon'ble Shri Justice Prashint Kumar Mishra 08.08.2014. Criminal Revision No. 213/2D14 and Cr.lVI.P. No. 236/2014 Shri Shashibhushan, counsel Shri Shashank Thakur, Govt.; Learned counsel for the app Court to withdraw the Criminal Revi; liberty to surrender. Prayer allowed. Both the matters are dismii aforesaid. [orthe applicants. kdvocate forthe State. icants seeks permission of the iion as well as the Cr.M.P. with sed as withdrawn with liberty |
|
| t'— | Sd//- PrashantKumarMishra Judge |
WU'BV A*I 1li"llf>fl, (I^-IK'IM —FS/140—2/2011—1,50,000.
1
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to permit withdrawal of criminal revision and connected criminal miscellaneous petition and grant liberty to surrender.
Mohd. Irfan
Mohd. Mustaq
State of Chhattisgarh
Prashint Kumar Mishra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court