Petitioners filed a contempt petition against PW.D. officials. Counsel submitted that the impugned order was complied with. The High Court accepted this submission.
Contempt petition dismissed on the ground of compliance of the order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
INTHE HON'BLEHIGHCOURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASFUR
Contempt Petitio^c'kro. / 2013
FETITIONERS : 1.
Narsingh S/o Late Tirith Ram, aged about 49 years, working as a labour at Junwani Road, Sub Division No. 3, in the P.W.D. Department, P.S. Jamul, Bhilai, Tahsil and Disfa-ict-Durg (C.G.).
Gulab Singh S/o Late Jharkhandi Singh, aged about 50 years, working as a store chowkidap at Sub Division No. 3, in P.W.D. Department, P.S. Mohan Nagar, Tahsil and District - Durg (C.G.).
3.
^ -^ "^
•sim
^/s: ;£l| 4.
'^^•^ , Ij
/'FA., ^ ^
Kumari Bai W/o Narsingh, aged about 44 years, D/o Manohar, working as a labour at Junwani Road, Sub Division No. 3, in the P.W.D. Department, P.S. Jamul, Bhilai, Tahsil and District-Durg (C.G.).
Khemlal S/o Late Dayaram Sinha, aged about 54 y'ears, working as a labour at Sub Division No. 2, Diirg as a Store Chowkidar in P.W.D. Department, P.S. Sector-6, Kotwali Bhilai, Tahsil and District- Durg (C.G.).
^<
Sahdev Yadav S/o Late Ganesh Yadav, aged about 43 years, working as a labour at Sub Division No. 1, P.W.D. Department at Durg headquarter, P.S.
^l
;3~E
B f-^
©
Mohan Nagar Durg, Tahsil and District - Durg (C.G.).
Santram S/o Jhadi Yadav, aged about 49 years, posted as a laboiir in P.W.D. departanent at Saja in the office of S.D.O. Saja, P.S. Devkar, Tahsil Saja,
District- Bemetara (C.G.).
VERSUS
CONTEMNORS :1. Shri R.P. Mandal, Chief Secretary, Department of P.W.D., Mahanadi Mantralaya, New Raipur, Dista-ict - Raipur (C.G.). 2. R.P. Dwivedi, Superintendent Engineer, Department of P.W.D., Durg Division No. 1 to 3, Durg, District - Durg (C.G.).
GONTEMPT PETITION UNDER SECTION "11 OF CONTEMPT PETITION READ WITH 12 OF THE CONTEMPT COURT ACT AND ARTICLE 215 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA
3'c^T "111.41rtii, tAxTlyJi<s', Rirtiy^-i.
'ffl^ff fh^tjshra? i^^.l^t^ ••••••••••••••••••^••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••^ 2-^j}^ 20
an^?T'q'ra; (i|cif-i»i<i»j)
311^1 Vf R-ti* TiTCRif if fe^t'rfSRcR
^TBIW: tfe sn^i
TttITSt^IWtIW ^aifFnsn^r
SBLj-lon'ble Shri Goutam Bhaduri. J.
4.02.2014
Shri G.P. Mathur, counsel foilthe applicants.
Shri Manoj Jaiswal, counsel tor respondent No.1.
Learned counsel for the appl|icants submits that the order has
been complied with and therefore ie do not want to prosecute this
matter.
Accordingly, the contempt p^tition is dismissed.
:• Sd/~
GoutamBhaduri
^
Sil:;,'i ^l'.:;:.
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the contempt petition should be dismissed given the compliance of the impugned order.
3 provisions across 2 enactments
Narsingh Labour
Gulab Singh
Kumari Bai
Khemlal
Sahdev Yadav
Mohan Nagar
Goutam Bhaduri
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
