Petitioner withdrew the contempt petition arising from a previous High Court order. The court dismissed the petition consequent upon the withdrawal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CONTEMPT @Qrt‘q No. 135 OF 2013
1N $Eagga:ggmz‘h
w.P.(C) 1998 OF 2012
PETITIONER: Kumari Bai Sahu W/o Laxmi Sahu, aged T V about 5O years Officiating Sarpanch Gram Panchyat Ha1d1 R/o Village Haldi Tah811 8L a: Police Station Gunderdehi District Balod «If.» .-" ) "w:f‘ $§a§wiw
VERSUS
RESPONDENTS :
Durga Prasad Sinha S/o Ashas Ram Sinha, aged about 4O years, R/o village— Haldi, Tahsil 85 Police Station— Gunderdehi, District— Balod (C.G.)
/ CONTEMPT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 215 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA READ WITH SECTION 12 OF THE CONTEMPT OF COURTS ACT, 1971. x“ Arising out of order dated 19—1 1—2012 passed by the Hon’ble High Court of Chhattisgarh in Writ Petition (C) N0.
\M)
mmw,§emm?,W
mm‘gm Wt 20
mm (WI)
i WWW mmm WWI§fwW§R iammm $31Tanané¥1 (SB. Hon’ble Shri Goutam Bhgguri, J.) 03.02.2014 Shri Shash§nk Thakur, Advcc‘;ate for the petitioner. Shri Amiyakant Tiwari, Advocate for the respondent No.3. Heard. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner do not wants to pursue the matter. in view of the statement made, the petition is dismissed. Sd/GoutamBhaduri Judge Aks
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Kumari Bai Sahu
Shri Alok Pandey
Shri L.N.Sahu
Durga Prasad Sinha
Goutam Bhaduri
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
