Writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India dismissed for want of prosecution as no other counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner nor any representation was made.
Writ petition dismissed for want of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HdN'BLEHlGMC:OUR^OI=CMHATTIS<3ARH
ATIBnjtSPUR
•^ 1'.. : -:!.': w.P.te^. No. S^ /2008 -•'^.1 PETITIONER/ : Su khi Ra m, S/o J u g utra m Applicant ..^••"' » aged a bout^o yea rs, ...•••""te^. ^i^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^'^^^^^^^;-^(s^" ^' No Village- Chantipali, Tahsil Sakti, District-Janjgir-Champa ...•-•"^^"^' (C.G.)
VERSUS .::.:' •-••°•':.
RESPONDENTS/ :1. Gangaram, S/o Chintaram Nqn-Applieant ,;?; ,^Ganda^'F^Q'^H;antipali, Tahsil-, Sakti, DtStt. Janjgir-Chainpa
(C.G.)
Non-applicant 2. State ofChhattisgarh THrough- The Collector Janjgir-Champa CC.G.) 3. The Additional Collector Janjg ir-Cha mpa (C. G.) 4 Sub-Divisional Officer (R) .0^ Sakti, Distt. Janjgtr-Champa ^y •©• :(C-G:0'''.:^-.:.: ^,.:'^-^ , ^^^^^ 5. Member, Revenue BQard,
4
.0^
-flts- ^y
•©•
^^^^^
5.
Chhatfisgarh at Bilaspur(C.G,}
6.'
TheAdclitional Tahsildat-,
MalkharQda^DistriGt-3anjgirGhamRa (C.G,)
'SiC
m
.;».! >SWIUTPEtlTroNUNI>ERARTICLE^i^2276"""':;""^""""''=^";l''":""'~^;s ;a CONSTITUTION OFINDIA. 1 :^
^^
-N! ;i i<>
a-He—78
'5^ •^nw<i, ^iil+i'Ko, fs|<?)iy^<
., u).?.CS) QJI/SLroS iiHCTt **11cb """"""""'•""" ""•/•••••••^200
sn^iTraq? (ijcifj«(^!;T)
'^yVw^vSTT^T w Wi^isti+iicti ?^nw ^ifer 3n^?r ^>l<lF<l4ll 'RR^ff ^ "fet^ Tf^R^R
^73iRW3TI^iI
i.B. Hon'ble Shri Justice PrashantKurrter Mishra
(12.12.2013.
Shri Mohd. Tarik Haider, Advocatej for the petitioner.
Ms. Raksha Awasthy, Pane]Lawy<ir for the State/respondents.
Learned counsel forthe petitioner ^leads no instructions.
Since no other counsel is appea( ing on behalf of the petitioner nor
^ny representation is made, the writ betition is dismissed for want of
brosecution.
Sd//- .. ,.-
prashantKumarMishra V
Judge <br>•<br>
Sukhi Ram
Gangaram
State of Chhattisgarh
Additional Collector Janjgir-Champa
Additional Tahsildar Malkharoda
Prashant Kumar Mishra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
