Santosh Kumar Sahu v. State of Chhattisgarh and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
.''<<^ ^ ^ y ^ ''s' - '< ^ 'f l- "- '^ '- ^…
.''<<^ ^ ^ y ^ ''s' - '< ^ 'f l- "- '^ '- ^…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
| ^^./ <ps'&. ''<<^ ^^ y^ ''s'- '<^ 'fl- "-'^ '- ^f > ifl 0—.t)^3 S «'£' o n faa s t.«t~ t-Ft t-' .Iv>^ ^y7s^ ^ft Irf 'hB^ 0 ^^ j3->3 a (a 1'f Ci Q : O O m. is cs' 1^. 5;»'RS '•""1 :a> (*•(»Bi '.I i c [••.1:1 .•• .: t'Sit " # tii<tl»<; 11 "L2i «•'(» W^ •^ri- S^rf n wo ^i (I!) ^ -i- "i r (•<•n O ffi 3 d ria^ "ki:< fl ^k-' V ^ ;ii ^ •R-u- '^ !^I s >a n.3' ^, |
|---|
c^
T^';?lpn?t:iT, ^ftWTS, ("Krtl'M^ u
<i«ir•ibiitti 20
<ffl^?i '<ra?7 (i?l3i';^i)
311^1 W ft-ti 'liwiyl'il-t •<i*<'"if if teat tr"i*{i<
<wiw <iftdai^i
'iwr sn^ff'ai^ra? ifraiiwon^i
S.B. Hon'ble Shri Justice Prashant Kjumar Mishra
02.12.2013.
None for the petitioner.
Shri Avinash K. Mishra, Panel Ijawyer for the State.
The matter was passed over oiice in absence of any representation
on behalf of the petitioner.
No one appears for the petition^ ;r even in the second call.
In the circumstances, there is n) other option leftwith the Court but to
dismiss the petition for want of prosecijtion.
The writ petition is dismissed fo|want ofprosecution.
prashant Kumar Mishra
Judge
,^-
SIRT^te^iT ^iinieW, n^rRnra—FS/48—8/2012—80,000.
•>' v
^"...— ,.;—^. S^^3^6k'^l*'Ji'":''
Petitioner
State
Prashant Kumar Mishra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court