S.P. Sinha v. State of Chhattisgarh and 6 Ors.

What is this about?

Hari Kishore Mishra) High Court of Chhattisgarh dismissed the petitioner's writ petition under Articles 32 and 226 of the Constitution as it had become infructuous on account of the lapse of time from the impugned order to the filing of the petition. The sole judge held that the delay rendered the prayer ineffective, leading to the dismissal of the writ.