The High Court of Chhattisgarh dismissed a writ petition filed under Articles 226/227 for want of prosecution, as neither party appeared in the second call.
Writ petition dismissed for want of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
va^i-a^w^^iwM'tS^ici.^^-.'^&^.-.r^ss-Mssm-.-eiBS
$>gft?;nc c-. i, .s^.Ht-StS.i.^sJi "W
^
^
Cf^- v^ ^_
IN THE HIGH COVRTOF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR S) W.P No. ^^-31_ /2Q06 <1
Smt. Sarla Karmahe Karmahe , W/o Shri Gyanesh kiw^ W^e £\lf— Aged"" about ~~; */yearsfliumfu"''•——=„..„-..„..^—-'.~-L——=-'"''Kannalie^yearsfliumfu"''•——=„..„-..„..^—-'.-L——=-'"''Kannalie^''•——=„._.„-..„..^—-'.-L——=-'"''Kannalie^ ^=^.—.-^_... : UDC Grade II , R/o Govt. Science CoUege ")?7?M
PETITIONER Smt. Sarla Karmahe Karmahe , W/o
£\lf—
^^•''-VAVV>^'^..-<^y-g>> -• Aged"" about ~~; */yearsfliumfu"''•——=„..„-..„..^—-'.~-L——=-'"''Kannalie^yearsfliumfu"''•——=„..„-..„..^—-'.-L——=-'"''Kannalie^''•——=„._.„-..„..^—-'.-L——=-'"''Kannalie^
^=^.—.-^_...
-c/^'^v--'^...'-''
^t ^X^)-?-<^ ..-• UDC Grade II , R/o Govt. Science
^.:' nY?< Rajnandgaon Dist. Rajnandgaon (C.G.)
'^-
^^y^^!.^
VERSUS
&«i^'
RESPONDBNTS : 1. The State of Chhattisgarh,
/'
Through the Secretary Departmeat Departmeat
ofhigher education education Mantralaya D.K.S.,
Jf
.-i^-:. ^ e h Bhawan Raipur (C.G.)
/ ^•'/•
/' 2. Principal, Govt. Science College ,
.^> ^^'
^ Rajnandgaon (C.G.).
<>»•
<».
WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 22^/227 OF THE
Rajnandgaon Dist. Rajnandgaon (C.G.)
Through the Secretary Departmeat Departmeat ofhigher education education Mantralaya D.K.S.,
CONSTITUTION OF INDIA.
Ifr
\v^9XI-HC—78
"5? ^IPTRT^, ©xil'y'ie,f°<dl'Hlt<i
_^t^..y.cl.lAe^^20
'<raq? (^fgsi^i)
ai^I^ll^W ^i*rif)4ti tiw^f ^T ts1^ <Tait^K
wnw giCT ar^
wn 3v^v snfe;! ^r atRlT an^I
S.B. Hon'ble Shri Justice Prashant l' ymar Mishra
04.12.2013
None for the petitioner.
Shri Adil Minhaz, Panel Lawyerjforthe State.
The matter was passed over oijice in absence of any representation on
behalf of the applicants. No one appe^rs for the petitioner even in the second
call.
In the circumstances, there is ^ o other option left with the Court but to
dismiss the writ petition forwant of pro^ecution.
Accordingly the writ petition is d 'smissed for want of prosecution.
Sd/-
Prashant Kumar Mishra
Judge
K
Smt. Sarla Karmahe Karmahe
The State of Chhattisgarh, Through the Secretary Department of higher education Mantralaya D.K.S.
Principal, Govt. Science College, Rajnandgaon (C.G.)
Prashant Kumar Mishra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
