Disposed

Gopal Kanwar v. Chhattisgarh Sate Power Distribution Company Limited And Ors.

Chhattisgarh HC2 Sept 2013WPS/2279/2013

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This court disposed of a writ petition filed by a suspended lineman, granting him liberty to file a departmental appeal within three weeks while clarifying that the court would consider any subsequent appeal expeditiously without deciding on merits immediately.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner permitted to withdraw petition with liberty to file a departmental appeal within three weeks and seek expedited consideration of the appeal.

Gopal Kanwar Vs Chhattisgarh Sate Power… — Service and Employment | Chhattisgarh HC (2013)

¶1

@Ag

¶2

[ &P‘(f@‘/

¶3

IN THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT^{OFCHHATTISGARHAT} BILASPUR (C.G.) single Writ Petition (S) No.2^2Uof2013

¶4

single Bench

¶5

PETITIONER

¶6

: Gopal Kanwar, aged about⁵⁴ son of Shri Baliram years, Kanwar, resident of Kalmi,^Tahsil & Police Station—Raigarh, Civil 8L Revenue District-Raigarh (C.G.)

¶7

VERSUS

¶8

RESPONDENTS

¶9

21A Chhattisgarh Sate Power Distribution Company Limited (CSPDCL) , through the Managing Manager, Raipur (C.G.) The Chief Engineer, CSPDCL, Bilaspur, P.S.-Bilaspur, Civil ‘85 Revenue District-Bilaspur (C.G.)

¶10

Superintending Engineer, CSPDCL,‘ Raigarh, P.S.-Raigarh,

¶11

' Civil 81; Revenue District-Raigarh (C‘G. )

¶12

The Executive Engineer, CSPDCL, Raigarh P.S.—Raigarh, Civil 85 Revenue District—Raigarh (C.G.) Vivke Gupta, Junior Engineer, Electricity Office, Sarangarh, Police Station—Sarangarh, Civil 8L Reveuen District—aigarhR (.G.)C Ramesh Kumar, Assistant Engineer, Electricity Office, Sarangarh, Police Station— Sarangarh, Civil 81; Revenue District—Raigarh (C.G.)

¶13

WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE

¶14

CONSTITUTION OF INDIA

EW,W,W

21m? wrg WW E20^l2

mm (W3)

Wmm	WW§WW
.B: HON’BLE JUSTICE MR. PRITI 02.09.2013 Shri Mano] JaisWal, counsel fo Shri Majid Ali, counsel for resp Challenge in the present writ p which the petitioner who is working as respondent No.4. Shri Ali submits that an appeal if S N	r petitioner. ndents No.1 to 4. tition is to the order dated 21 3.2013 by sstt. Lineman has been suspended by lies before respondent No.3 against the ER DIWAKER
suspension order and therefore, respondent No.3. Counsel for‘the petitioner furt withdraw this petition with liberty , respondent No.3 and the respondent appeal as expeditiously as possible p the date of copy of receipt of the said is under suspension since 21 .3.1 3. ’ The petitioner is permitted to ‘ to file a departmental appeal before r ming of any such appeal by the petiti would be decided in accordance preferably ^{within a}period ^{of 3 week} said appeal. It is made clear that this Cou‘rt of the case and the authority cOnc ‘ departmental appeal of the petiti accordance with law after due scruti caSe. .r	he petitioner should first approach r submits that he may be permitted to o file a departmental appeal before 0.3 may be directed to decide the s'aid ferably within a period of 3 weeks from I ppeal ^{as for no fault of the}petitioner ^he ithdraw the present petition with liberty. spondent No.3 and in the eventuality of ner before respondent No.3, the same ith law as expeditiously as possible from the date of copy of receipt of the as not expressed any opinion on merits ned would be at liberty todeoide the ner as. expeditiously as possible in y ^{of the facts and Circumstances of the T} Sd/- Pritinker Diwaker Judge

Wmm

WW§WW

.B: HON’BLE JUSTICE MR. PRITI
02.09.2013
Shri Mano] JaisWal, counsel fo
Shri Majid Ali, counsel for resp
Challenge in the present writ p
which the petitioner who is working as
respondent No.4.
Shri Ali submits that an appeal

if
S
N

r petitioner.
ndents No.1 to 4.

tition is to the order dated 21 3.2013 by

sstt. Lineman has been suspended by
lies before respondent No.3 against the

ER DIWAKER

suspension
order
and
therefore,
respondent No.3.
Counsel for‘the petitioner furt
withdraw
this
petition
with
liberty
, respondent No.3 and the respondent
appeal as expeditiously as possible p
the date of copy of receipt of the said
is under suspension since 21 .3.1 3.
’
The petitioner is permitted to
‘
to file a departmental appeal before r
ming of any such appeal by the petiti
would
be
decided
in
accordance
preferably ^{within a}period ^{of 3 week}
said appeal.
It is made clear that this Cou‘rt
of the
case
and
the
authority cOnc
‘
departmental
appeal
of
the
petiti
accordance with law after due scruti
caSe.
.r

he
petitioner
should
first
approach
r submits that he may be permitted to
o
file
a
departmental
appeal
before
0.3 may be directed to decide the s'aid
ferably within a period of 3 weeks from
I
ppeal ^{as for no fault of the}petitioner ^he
ithdraw the present petition with
liberty.
spondent No.3 and in the
eventuality of
ner before respondent No.3, the same
ith
law
as
expeditiously
as
possible
from the date of copy of receipt of the
as not expressed any opinion on merits
ned would
be
at
liberty todeoide the
ner
as. expeditiously
as
possible
in
y ^{of the facts and Circumstances of the T}
Sd/-
Pritinker Diwaker
Judge

Gopal Kanwar v. Chhattisgarh Sate Power Distribution Company Limited And Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Gopal Kanwar v. Chhattisgarh Sate Power Distribution Company Limited And Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rajnish Tiwari Vs State Of Chhattisgarh And Ors.

Tika Ram Khatkar and Ors. Vs State Of Chhattisgarh and Ors.

Himanshu Chandrakar Vs State Of Chhattisgarh And Anr.

Rajendra Tiwari Vs State of Chhattisgarh and Ors.

Naresh Kumar Yadav Vs State Bank of India and Anr.

Rupesh Kumar Gupta Vs State Of Chhattisgarh And Ors.