Naresh Kumar Yadav v. State Bank of India and Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court dismissed a Writ Petition under Articles 226/227 CPA as infructuous at the hearing.
What did the court decide?
The petition dismissed as infructuous.
The High Court dismissed a Writ Petition under Articles 226/227 CPA as infructuous at the hearing.
The petition dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
..^y
IN THE HISH 5QVVS OF CHBASTISSABHAT BIIiASP^R
WEIT PE2ISI8K M@
^2.8
PB'DI'tieBEB
HaresM Emnar Yadav, Age 42 Years,
g/o. Shri IiMmi Baraysn Yadav, B/o." Khuatapara Bongargarh,
Mstt. Rajnandgaon,(G&$.
Tereus
Thr. Beputy &eneral Baaager, Zaaal ©ffice,
Baipur, (g.&.).
Seetor-I, Ehilai,
^.^^s
v,p^ws^j
^^•-"
Mstt. Burg, (0.&.).
TOI2_¥ETIBIQM_CTBBE AB2IGEBS 226/227 ®r 1?HE
GP IHMA
3S? •<ll<1M<4,'^tft?FR', teTRTy
^^..^.:.£.:..^/'3......^.'^J.^^.
3T[^!<raq?(r)
^IW wnwHfRsn^i ^p4^Nt*if ^W^ ^ 'fe^ Xf^^H
ffW 3)1^1 s(?qw ^aifOTai^r
S.B. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRimNKER DIWAKER
2.9.2013:
!t
ShriAshok Das Vaishnav, ^ounsel for the petitioner.
Shri B.D. Guru, counsel fo the respondents.
Counsel for the petitioner ^ubmits that the instant petition has
become infructuous.
Accordingly, the petition [is dismissed as having become
jnfructuous.
Sd/-
PritinkerDwaker
1
Judge
^'.^-
^
Hareem Yadav
State Bank of India
Pritinker Dwaker
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court