The High Court disposed of the writ petition challenging a dismissal of an injunction application in a property suit. The Court directed the trial court to decide the suit within eight months and maintained status quo.
Directing the trial court to decide the suit within eight months and maintaining status quo despite no formal ruling on the injunction.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN.THEJ^ON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
(C.G.)
WRIT PETITION (227) N0. QE20Q9 glj^y^
PETITIONER
PLAINTIFF
^'
^^ -:^4-^.^Aa ..^'p^s^ 9>---'
Ajeet Manjhi, S/o Sunil Kumar Manjhi, aged about 24 years, R/o Near Welcome Kiraya Bhandar Pandri, Police Station Pandri (Mova), Raipur, Tahsil and District Rafpur (C.G.)
VERSUS
L- —^-
RESPONDENT : DEFENDANT
Prashant Kumar Sahu, S/o Thanuram Sahu, aged about 40 years, R/o Panchvati Nagar, Mova, Police Station Pandri (Mova), Raipur, Tahsil and District Raipur (C.G.)
^•;l|8te-;. WRITPETITION UNDER ARTICLE 227 OFTHE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA JUte
1
*tS-s^' ^S
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
SB: Hon'ble Shri Justice Pritinker Diwaker
W.P. (227) No. 2544/2009
PETmONER/ PLAINTIFF
Ajeet Manjhi
VERSUS
RESPONDENT
Prashant ^''-n ^ahu
DEFENDANT
Shri P.P. Sahu counsel forthe petitioner. Shri Pushkar Sinha counsel for the respondent.
ORDER (03.10.2013)
Petitioner/plaintiff has challenged the order dated 13.4.2009 (Annexure P-1) passed by Additional District Judge, Raipur reversing the order dated 3.3.2009 (Annexure P-8) passed by Civil Judge Class-11 Raipur, granting injunction in his favour.
2--
w
-.^t'^'
from the land in question. Against the order granting injunction in favour of the petitioner/plaintiff, appeal was preferred by respondent/defendant and vide order impugned the order passed by learned Civil Judge has been reversed by the appellate Court.
SdiPritinker Diwakar Judge
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petition challenging the appellate order granting injunction in a property dispute should be disposed of by directing the trial court to decide the suit expeditiously.
2 provisions across 1 enactments
Ajeet Manjhi
Prashant Kumar Sahu
Shri Pritinker Diwakar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
