such application. He further submits that the petitioners may be required to confront the plaintiff with his signatures on the said application. 05. On the other hand, learned counsel for the State submits that once the certified copies of the documents; which are sought to be called, are already on record, there is no necessity to summon the original of the same. , 06. The suit was filedsome time in the year 2004. While entertaining this petition, an interim relief was granted in favour of the petitioners on 22.11.2006 and since then further proceedings of the trial Court are stayed. Hence without entering into the merits of the case, the order impugned dated 29.9.2006 is hereby set aside. Consequently, the application (Annexure P/4) tiled by the petitioners under Order 13 Rule 10 C.P.C. is allowed. The trial Court is directed to immediately summon 'original the record, as sought by the petitioners, of the concerned Revenue Court and to make all possible endeavour to decide the suit itself expeditiously, preferablywithina period of six months from the ' next date of hearing. The petitioners are also directed not to seek any unnecessary adjournments in the case and to co-operate in the proceedings.
