In this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution, the High Court dismissed the matter for want of prosecution as petitioners did not appear on two consecutive hearing dates despite summons.
Writ petition dismissed for want of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
‘
? ;
Web
IN THE HIGH COURT OF CIIA'l‘TISGg“j, BILASPUR ‘
/
'7 63 /2oo4 /
WRIT PETITION No.
Coa‘ India retired offwers’ association
Through t Its President, Baldeo Singh,
House No. HIG w 54,
Maharana Pratap Nagax, f' No.1
,‘
I
‘
Lgféw. ‘
Baldeo sangh,
> ‘ ouse No. HIG — 54, ‘ .‘ ;:..~"@c‘ g, '
V .-""\c;,‘<"‘ of}? »
aharana Pramp Nagar, ’ I 0‘ PETITIONER No.2
Kom Dist : Korba (CG) $ § Ky ‘ 9p”
w? - 4:9“ "
Q'gzgo
e)
Versus
Coal India Limited
Through Its Chairman-cum—Managing Directoy
”f
10, Netaji Subhash Road, — " RESPONDENT
o Kolkata - 700 001
o
Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of Imiia. _ V
*MM M‘
/ - Mr-rw-” A.-...—‘
i }
3£”WW:gfswtwe,%awgr
‘
9 W ‘Po
mew ewa‘ee 133*?
% a m
a§¥¥§§#$
ww a??? 31W
m§a$$%m%
S:B.‘Hon’ble Shri Justice N.K. Mai:
10.12.2013
None for the petitioners.
Shri Sudip Agrawal, Advooate for the respondent.
The matter is called for he aring twice. On both the occasions?
, none appears norany represenmtion is made on behalf of the
petitioners. The petitioners may 11 0t be interested in the matter.
In View of the above, th e matter is dismissed for want of
prosecution. No order as to costs.
Sd#
N.K. AgarWa]
Judge
\
X.
Coal India Retired Officers Association
Baldeo Singh
Coal India Limited
N.K. Mai
N.K. Agarwal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
