Narbada Prasad "Ravi" v. Collector, Korea and Others
Case brief
What is this about?
COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT WRIT PETITION No.…
COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT WRIT PETITION No.…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT
WRIT PETITION No. ———]l/—j——/200§/ PETITIONER: Narbada Prasad RaVI, S/O RT an W M (f W m£9; VERSUS RESPONDENTSW: l. Collector, Korea, « f\ Baikunthpur, k Korea (C.G.) wplst '2./’ Sarpanch, Gram Panchayat, $ Semra, Tahoil & P.S.H. yfManendragarh ' Dist.‘Korea (C.G.) Dhaneshwar Ram, S/o. Chirouji Lal Ram, aged about 27 years, Vill.— Semra, Tahi & P.S.H.— Manendragarh ~Korea Dist (C G ) PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF CQNSTITUTION OF INDIA
SB: HON. SHRI N.K. AGARYVAL, J.
10.12.2013
None for the petitioner.
E
Shri A.V.Shridhar. P.L. f r the State.
Since no one appears or any representation is made on
behalf of the petitioner despit the matter is caiied on for hearing
twice, therefore, in the absen e of any representation, this Court
has no option but to dismiss th petition for want of prosecution.
Accordingly, this peti on is dismissed for want of
prosecution. ‘ I
r Sd/-
No order as to costs.
i N.K. Agrawal
Judge
Mym
Narbada Prasad RaVI
The State and Others
N.K. Agrawal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court