Dismissed

Suresh Kumar Thakur and Ors. v. State of Chhattisgarh and Ors.

Chhattisgarh HC2 Dec 2013WP/1195/2005

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioners sought to withdraw Writ Petition No. 508 of 2005 under Article 226/227 of the Constitution with liberty to file representation. The court granted the liberty and dismissed the petition as withdrawn.

What did the court decide?

Permission to withdraw with liberty to file representation granted. Petition dismissed as withdrawn. Interim relief petition dismissed.

Suresh Kumar Thakur and Ors. Vs State of… — Service and Employment | Chhattisgarh HC (2013)

^se L

ift

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR fC.G.)

¶5

WRIT PETITION N0. MO)'S--/2005.

¶6

PETITIONERS ;1.

¶7

Suresh kumar Thakur, S/o latp Stiri Nihal Sing Thakur, aged about 47 years, Qceupation-Male Health Supervisor, Heaffh Department, Sector-Sukama, Block- Sukama.

¶8

/"l. Nav'al Ram Sethia, S/o Late Shri AsaiMiQO Ram Sethia, aged about 46 yearsy Occupation-Service, Malel-lealth Supervisor, Health _(^^Department, Sector-Gadiras, Bloek^ Sykama.

¶9

/"l.

¶10

¶11

Dasmu Ram Kashyap, S/o Shri Khuti Ram Kashyap, aged about M years, Occu pati on - S e rv ice, Male ht®aIth SupervisCir, Health DepartmBnt, SectoT-Keralapal, Block-Sukarna.

¶12

¶13

D.L. Devangan, S/o 1-ate Sh;rii;Rami Dayal Devangan, aged about|47 ye a rs, O cc u p a t i an - S e r vrc e , M a le Hea 11 h S u p e rvis4Ki .KeaMK ; ^ I Departmen^ SeGtOF-<ihtiiRclga|rhs«s Block-Chhindgarh. 1

¶14

^Q^

¶15

Pradeep Kumar Khalkho, S/o Late Shri Blasiyus Khalkho, aged about 40 ye a rs, Qccu pation - Servi ce, M a te HealthSupervisor, Health Department, Seclor-Chitagufa, BloGkKonta.

¶16

¶17

R.A. Yadafif, S/o Late Shri M.R. Yadav, aged aboul 42 years, Occupation- Sgrvice, Male Health Supervisor, H^alth De|partment, Sector-Korra, Klock-Sukama.

¶18

¶19

AU i^stfiel So ufhBgjSta r- D aretewad^;"' ^i5:Millaiis^rh:):^':|l ; ':i1

¶20

¶21

;e .t

¶22

		(2)
	VE	RSUS
RESPONDENTS:	^1)	State of Chhattisgarh , Through< Secretary Health DepaTtm^nt, D.K.S. Bhawan, 'Raipur (C.G.).
	^ 2) ^3)	The Director, HealthServices, Chhattisgarh, D.K.S. Bhawan, ''•Raipur,(C.G.). *t- The Secretary, General Admin istration Department, Chhattisgarh Govt., D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.).
	/4)	^ Chief Medical and Health OffiGeF, Distt- South Bastar, Dantewadia (C.G.)

¶23

WRIT PETITION UNDiERARTICLE 226/227 OF IHE CONSTITUTION OF liNDIA. FOR ISSUEING RllTi/ WRITS OR DIRECTION / DIRECTIONS,

¶24

1^'~"H ^
'^-•~i^,.''<br>i;:t^ 3
.^ /^
-^m^
, •d^5< •"^'('^1^^' -^^itFT^ 11®I^TT^'T
.^:l.^o:.l'i5.
35^

¶25

li0°ft I,
ss'iw^f WPtiS^ •TPTrff " f"7r ''J5i-i?H
"asfTsn^i K W.
ftsnssia']??'
^B—HONSHRHsTK7AGARi^LJ~
02.12.2013 |
Shri Subhash Yadav, co^jnsel for the"petitioners.
Shri M.P.S.Bhatia, Dy. q.A. forthe State.
Counsel for the petition^rs seeks permission to withdraw
this petition with liberty to file'*r£Ipresentation.
Liberty, as prayed for, is granted.
Therefore, this petition isIdismissed as withdrawn.
M.W.P. No.958 of 2005 flor grant of interim relief also stands
dismissed.
No orderas tocosts.
j ] N.K.Agrawal
Judge
<• ^)tf-

Suresh Kumar Thakur and Ors. v. State of Chhattisgarh and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Suresh Kumar Thakur and Ors. v. State of Chhattisgarh and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shri Kumar Dwivedi Vs State of Chhattisgarh and Ors.

Chudamani Sidar Vs the State of Chhattisgarh and Ors.

Dr.K.P.Dubey Vs State

Shri Radheshyam Dansena Vs State Bank of India and Ors.

Municipal Corp.Bhilai Vs Smt.Shyamli Chatterjee and Ors.

The State of C.G. Thrg. Supri.Org. Vs Sudama Ram Netam