Narendra Kumar Dubey v. C.G.Adhosanrachana and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR (C.G.) WRIT…
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR (C.G.) WRIT…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Ci^ 'rr.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR (C.G.)
PETITIONER:
^^r^
/ c^^^^y.^
'^^yx
'y^'>~'/?T.<y^'.-<""
-^>'"
^y^
^'
Versus
RESPONDENTS:
^ Wf»^
/ Nigam (Periwah^i prabhag) Raipur (c.g.)Through-^CompQtentAuthority, General Manager, Raipur.
WRIT PETITON UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITIUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF APPROPRIATE WRIT ORDER AND DIRECTION.
'SSa^E'BSs^^''*"^'3
'^=
:.-^^.^ 1
•
i^.^' - <a£l-. y^ 1,^
^^€/
--^
^- c
~s^3( '<ii<4i<n<i, ^Ti1-M<i<o, rsiitni'yy 11«1CTI W(^...W^l4s.cNJ.^."".."..^20
^V^ J^3K (^y^)
3n^r1sRtf<»<i<h cr)Ht^<ftl 1M^<nw ww <w<^y
'WT ssii^i sh ^ 3tRVH 3TT^T
S.B. Hon'ble Shri Justice N.K. Asarwal
06.12.2013
None for the petitioner. |
None forthe respondent.
The matter is called for heal ing twice. On both the occasions none
appears nor any represehtation is r< lade on behalfofthe petitioner.
In view of the above, tl- e matter is dismissed for want of
prosecution. No order as-to costs.
Sd/-
N. K. Agarwal
Judge
SoJL.
(IW<Cl4^Jl^*yiUtl<!W, U^-li^lk—FS/48—8/2012—80,000«
<br>
1 provisions across 1 enactments
X Narendra Kumar Dubey
Chhattisgarh Adhikaran Vikas Nigam (Mahanagar Parishad)
Industrial Training Institute Gourela
N. K. Asarwal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court