The High Court of Chhattisgarh disposed of a writ petition filed by Krishi Upaj Mandi Samiti challenging the removal of an employee. The court granted liberty to the petitioner to pass a fresh order in light of the lack of authority of the adjudicating officer.
Liberty granted to the petitioner to pass a fresh order in accordance with law.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
^
AMENDEDPETITION
INTHEHlGHCOUFiTOFJUDICATURECHHATTISGARH.AT'Bll.ASPUR
w.p.No. i86i/^eeSlabi-
PETITIONER:
Krishi Upaj Mandi Sarhiti, Arang Through President, Krishi Upaj Mandi Samiti, Arang, District Raipur, CHhattisgarh
VERSUS
i.&^l W^:S& RiESPONDENTS: ^ :—— IBii5 ww^ f^M'
WRIT PETITIONUNOER^RTICLES 226/227 OFTHEGONSTITUTIONiOR INDIA ' ': : ; ; ^ .:. • • • •-. -... : .::'.^
Stil,
^[O
';:;lTT!M'!T, ^^WT®,T^TOH?
i^or rjo)y<s
*i:"i<l w r •^Tqf^ysT^ '??lT^t ^ fe%t
Wlsn^T9;31W q? sffiTE; Siltn
S.B.: Hoa'ble M».Justice B.K. Aaarwal
09.12.2013
Mr. S.S. Masih, Co'ua^^el for fhe petitioner.
Mr. N.K. Vyas, Couns^]^l for respondent No. 1.
la view of the fact thal^ respondent No. 1 was reiaoved
by a Nakedar, who was no^ hayiag aay authority to pass
such order, leamed counsell for the petitioner subinits fhat
this petitiou may be dispij)!>sed of with a liberiy to fh.e
petitioner to pass a fi-eshor(|ler in accordance with law.
Accordingly, fhe writ ^etition is disposed ofwifh the
aforesaid liberty granted ir^ favour of tfae petitioner. No
order as to costs.
Sd/-
N.K.Agrawal
Judge
Jh-
^
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition should be disposed of with liberty to contest the validity of the removal order.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Krishi Upaj Mandi Samiti, Arang
Narsingh Namdeo
Presiding officer, Labour Court, Raipur
B.K. Agrawal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
