The High Court of Chhattisgarh granted the petitioner permission to withdraw the writ petition after the respondent State confirmed willingness to accept the tender forms submitted under an extended deadline.
Permission to withdraw the writ petition granted; petition disposed of as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
3v
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH ATBILASPUR
D.B.: HON'BLE Mr. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR SINHA & HON'BLE Mr. JUSTICE RADHE SHYAM SHARMA
W.P.fCl N0.419/2012
PETITIONER
M/s. Sai Consideration, through its Partner Atul Shukla, S/o Shree Sudama Prasad Shukla, Aged about 40 years, R/o Green Park Colony, Bilaspur (C.G.)
Versus
WRIT PBTITION UNDBR ARTICLB 226 OF THE CONSITUTION OF INDIA
Appearance:
Mr. Mahendra Dubey and Mr. Rahul Jha, Counsel for the petitioner.
Mr. M.P.S. Bhatia, Dy. Government Advocate for the State. ORAL ORDER^ (06.03.2012)
The following order of the Court was passed by
Sunil Kumar Sinha. J.
Heard.
Return has been filed on behalf ofthe respondents. Mr. Bhatia, in view of para 2 of the return, makes categorical statement that the respondents are ready to supply tender form to the petitioner and if the petitioner takes/receives the tender form by the evening of 07th of March 2012 and subm'rts
^
W.P.<Cl N0.419/2012
its tender form by 11 a.m. of 12th of March 2012, the tender form submitted by the petitioner shall also be taken into consideration in accordance with law, as the period of submission of tender forms has been extended till 12th of March 2012 by the order of this Court.
In view of the above categorical statement made by learned counsel for the State, learned counsel for the petitioner seek permission to withdraw this writ petition.
Permission granted.
Accordingly, the writpetition is disposed of, as withdrawn. Certified copy be supplied today itself.
Sd/-
Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge
Sd/R.S. Sharma Judge
J^ /w_
M/s. Sai Consideration
State of Chhattisgarh
The Executive Engineer, Public Works Department (P.W.D.), Bilaspur
Sunil Kumar Sinha
Radhe Shyam Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
