An appellant sought permission to withdraw his writ appeal regarding service matters. The High Court granted permission for withdrawal and consequently dismissed the appeal as withdrawn in an oral order.
Permission granted to withdraw the writ appeal; writ appeal dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
VJ'
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
,B.: HON'BLE Mr. JUSTICE SUNIL KUIVIAR SINHA & HON'BLE Mr. JUSTICE RADHE SHYAM SHARMA
WRIT APPEAL N0.131/2012
Sheikh Abdul Sadique, S/o Sheikh Abdul Rajjak, aged about 31 Occupation years, Service (Shiksha Karmi Grade111/Cluster Coordinator), R/o Polampalli, Block & Tehsii Konta, District South Bastar, Dantewada (C.G.)
Versus
RESPONDENTS 1 State of Chhattisgarh, Through the Secretary, Department of Panchayat & Rural Development, D.K.S. Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur (C.G.)
Appearance:
Mr. Atanu Ghosh, Counsel for the appellant. Mr. UNS Deo, Government Advocate for the State,
.^sae
^
WRIT APPEAL N0.131/2012
ORAL ORDER (19.03.2012)
The following order of the Court was by passed Sunil Kumar Sinha. J.
Heard.
Learned counsel for the appellant submits that the order impugned in the writ petition i.e. order dated 15.12.2011 (Annexure P/6 in the writ petition), has already been withdrawn by the concerned authority. In view of the above subsequent development, he seeks permission to withdraw this writ appeal Permission granted.
Accordingly, the writ appeal is dismissed, as withdrawn.
Sd/-
Sunil Kumar Slnha Judge ^ Ij
Sd/R.S. Sharma Judge
Sheikh Abdul Sadique
State of Chhattisgarh
The Mission Director, Rajiv Gandhi Shiksha Mission
The Collector/Mission Leader, Rajiv Gandhi Shiksha Mission
The Chief Executive Officer, Jila Panchayat
The DistrictProject Coordinator
Sunil Kumar Sinha
Radhe Shyam Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
