Review application filed challenging an order holding that Enami/Maphi land was not covered by a revenue provision. The court found no ground for review and dismissed the petition.
Petition for review dismissed. No order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BII‘ASPUR (ca) mum8emh (7'? . g9. No....../.. . . ............../2012
APPLICANT:
M/s Alok Infotech Private Limited Subhash Chowk, Raigarh (C.G.) through Director frgit Rateria, S/ Shri/S/ainjay q Rateria, Aged about 31 Years, R/ o Subhash Chowk Raigarh (CG)
VERSUS
RESPONDENTS: 1.
fate of Chhattisgarh Through the Collector, Raigarh (C.G.)
- {he Tahsildar, Raigarh District Raigarh(C.G.) 3. /r/h/e Sub—Registrar, Office of the District Registrar, Raigarh, District Raigarh (CG)
V7
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Review (P) No. 47/2012
APPLICANT,
M/ s Alok Infotcch Private Limited
VERSUS
REQPONDENTS
1 . State of Chhatu'sgarh 2. The'I‘ahsildar, 3 . The Sub-Registrar
APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF ORDER DATED 21/2/2012. (SB'Hon’bleMr T. .Sharma, J )
Present—Mr. Varun Shanna Advccate for the petiticner. Mr. Sudhir Bajpai,kdvocate for the State/respondents.
ORDER ' (Passedon02/04/2012)
Sdl—
T. P.Sharma Judge
1 provisions across 1 enactments
M/s Alok Infotech Private Limited
State of Chhattisgarh
T. P. Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
