A review petition challenging an order under Article 227 was dismissed. The High Court held that in light of the Bhumiswami Right granted to a Kotwar by the Revenue Authority based on the impugned order, no grounds for review existed.
Review petition dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
bf /
1N THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
(CG)
APPLICANT:
M/ s Alok Infotech Private Limited Subhash Chowk, Raigarh through (C.G.) Director Amit Rateria, S/ o Shri Sanjay Rateria, Aged about 31 Years, R/o Subhash Chowk Raigarh (C.G.)
VERSUS
RESPONDENTS: 1. @f Chhattisgarh Through the Collector, Raigarh (C.G.) 2. v he Tahsildar, Raigarh District Raigarh(C.G.) 3 e Sub-Registrar, Office of the District Registrar, Raigarh, District Raigarh (C.G.)
APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF ORDER DATED 21/02/2012
(E?
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Review (p) No. 45/2012
APPLICANT
M/ s Alok Infotech Private Limittd
VERSUS
RESPONDENTS 1. State of Chhatu‘sgarh 2. The Tahsildar, 3. The Sub-Registrar
AppucA'non Fox Revmw or onnER DATER21I2/ 2012. (SB:Hon’bleMr.T.P.a§§%irma,J.)
Present-Mr. Varun Shanna, Advocate forthe petitioner. Mr. Sudhir Bag'pai, Advocate for the State/respondents.
ORDER (Passedon02/04/20 12)
1 Sd/T. P. Sharma Judge
3 issues framed by the court
Whether there is any ground for review of the order dated 21/02/2012 passed in W.P. (Art. 227) No. 7909/2011 in the light of Bhumiswami Right granted to Kotwar by Revenue Authority.
Whether the claim that land was Enami/Mafi land given by Malgujar exempts it from Section 158(3)(ii) of the C.G. Land Revenue Code, 1959.
Whether the review petition is maintainable.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
M/s Alok Infotech Private Limited
State of Chhattisgarh
The Tahsildar
The Sub-Registrar
T. P. Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
