The high court allowed an application for restoration. The Misc. Appeal (C) No. 1079 of 2009, previously dismissed for want of prosecution, was restored to its original number due to sufficient cause.
Restoration of Misc. Appeal (C) No. 1079 of 2009 to its original number.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
Singte Bench: Hon' ble Shri R.N. Chandrakar, J
NI.C.C. No. 477 of 2012
Applicants 1. Smt. Jimat Bai, widow of late Mohan Lal Sahu, aged about 30 years. 2. Ku. l-1em]ata, d/o. late Mohan Lal Sahu, aged about^ 14 years. 3. Ku. Dali d/o. late Mohan Lal Sahu, aged about 11 years. 4. Gulshan s/o. late Mohan Lal Sahu, aged about 8 years. No. 2 to 4 are minor through natural guardian mother Jimat Bai widow of late Mohan Lal Sahu. 5. Smt. Sumitra Bai Sahu, aged about 60 years, widow of Gajalal Sahu. All are r/o. Shitlapara Ward Dhamtari, Tahsil and District Dhamtari (CG).
Versus
Respond^nte 1. Mohit Kumar Sahu, s/o. Ram Prasad Sahu, r/o. FCI, near Godown, Audyogik Ward Adhari, Nawagaon, Dhamtari, Tahsil and District Dhamtari (CG). 2. Ashok Patel, s/o. Budh Patel, r/o. Hatkeshar Ward, Dhamtari, Tahsil and District Dhamtari (CG). 3. Regional Manager, United India Insurance Company Limited, Krishna Complex, Kachhari Chowk, Raipur, District Raipur (CG).
(Application for restoration of M.A. (C) No. 1079 of 2009)
Present:
Shri S.P. Sahu, counsel for the applicants.
Oral Order
(Passedon 15-6-2012)
%> I J /
SdfR.N. Chandrakar Judge
Raju
1 issue framed by the court
Whether sufficient cause has been established to allow restoration of aMisc. Appeal dismissed for want of prosecution.
Smt. Jimat Bai
Ku. Lailata
Ku. Dali
Gulshan Sahu
Smt. Sumitra Bai Sahu
Mohanit Kumar Sahu
Shri R.N. Chandrakar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
