The appeal by Smt. Pushpa Thakur under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act for compensation was dismissed for non-compliance with a prior peremptory order dated 15.06.2012 by 10.10.2012.
Appeal treated as dismissed for non-compliance of the peremptory court order dated 15.06.2012.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
'^-
i:
| INTHE HON'BLE HIGH C BIL M.A.fONo. |
OURT OF CHHATTISGARHAT ASPUR ^>r/- c^ ^Q^^of2009 ^HQ^ |
|---|---|
| APPELLANT )^'A ..AAZ<^ |
Smt. Pushpa Thakur, Wd/o Chand Singh, aged about 46 years, R/o Sahagaon, Police |
| ^,,^^'3 •^A-" VERS ^^^^^ |
Station & Tahsil-Daundilohara, District-Durg (C.G.) US |
| RESPONDENTS :1. |
Rahim Khan, S/o Shekh |
| ^> | Rasool, age not known, R/o |
| Ward No. 33, Rajnandgaon, District-Rajnandgaon (C.G.) (Driver) |
|
| ^_2. ^ |
Sumeshwari, D/o Rajendra Singh, aged about 30 years |
| , R/o Jamatpara, Rajnandgaon, District-Rajnandgaon (C.G.) |
|
| (Owner) | |
| Q-3. | The New India, Insurance |
| Company Limited, Branch |
|
| Manager, Branch Office Power | |
| House Bhilai, District-Durg (C.G.) |
|
| ( Insurer of Vehicle Maruti Van No. C.G. 08-5351) |
|
| APPEALUNDERSECTION | 173 OF THE MOTOR VEHICLE |
ACT 1988
I
XI-HC—78
^
T^T ^l'qi^-q, ^»ttiy<|<S, {s|<?->l^^<
G /OQ. ^- 1 ^- I-^oa^ 'RTO^T sb^l<* •^ 20
3^?T XTs^R (4G<f^<i8T)
3TT^T ?FT t^TNT 'ct)i^i^^rr ^i^oii ^ f^^i <r^^K
^^TTW^f^T ^T^T
^^T 3^T $h^i<=h ^3tRP:T37T^T
DiyJsioaBench
Hon'ble Shri Raieev GuDt&.CJ. &
Hon'ble Shri Rananath CW andrafcar. J.
15.66,2012
Shri Basant Kaiwartyl i, counsel for the appellant.
Shri VK Sharma,cou| isel for respondent No.2.
Shri Dashrath Gupta,| counsel for respondent No.3.
Shri Basant Kaiwarltya, learned counsel for the appellant
r^'
prays for and is granted tw| 3 weeks' time for compliance of the order
dated 10.10.2011.
In the event of th^ appeitant's failure to comply with the
order dated 10.10.2011 w|thin the above stipulated period of two
weeks, the appeal itself ^hall stand dismissed without reference
to the Bench.
Sd/-
R.N. Chandrakar
Sd/-
Judge
Chief Justice
subbu
^°"v7
T^! ^NI<^^, y>Tf1-M<i<s, fa^iyy
'W^fT ^W^?
^3
TT^ 20
an^r ^rasR (Tjcrf^g^)
|^T^T^ I^Jch
'cCT^IWT 5b^|cb|^HWTrft^T'STT^T|^hni<rt<il'i 'HR^Tf"^ft^^f^FgT?
^) ^tfW 3Tf^?T|
|---|---|---|
|||30/08/2012|
|||This
case
is
treated
as
dismissed for non-compliance of
peremptory
court's
order
dated
15.06.2012 (for details note-sheet
partmaykindiybeseen).
Counsei
be
informed
accordingiy.|
|||Sd/-
A.R.(J)|
|||S^iCjvill|
f^\
1
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Pushpa Thakur
Rahim Khan
Sumeshwari
The New India, Insurance Company Limited
Raheem Gupta
Rananath Chandrakar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
