M/S Hariyali Restaurant and Ors. v. Bank of Baroda and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
CFooooo53I2”yZI/” I! EN THE HIGHCOURT OF…
CFooooo53I2”yZI/” I! EN THE HIGHCOURT OF…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
l/HIIIIIIII IIIIHII CFooooo53I2”yZI/” I!
EN THE HIGHCOURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR (CG)
MISC“ CIVIL CASE No.4il1/2001
APPQICATION UNDER ORDER 33 RULE 1 FOR PERMISSION TO FILE AN APPEAL AS AN INDIGENT PERSON»
3mgamma. @tmma. m—cmmx
\4‘10‘ mm Wia‘hCt W 2U
WM W (1WD
| Wwmfvm H211 m‘am |
mn;&—3:§m mm" (v' if ‘3‘ ’T Ulufiél? mm nf’a‘am |
|---|---|
| Sahu .-.,....__; |
S.B. Hon’ble Shri Justice N.K. Agarwal 14.08.2012 I None for the applicants. None for the respondent. i The matter is called for h aring twice. On both the occasions, none appears nor any represe tation is made on behalf of the applieants. The applicants may riot be interested in the matter, In View of the above, the matter is dismissed for want of prosecution. No order as to costs sm- N.K. AGnAwAL l JUDGE i/ . ..v _.u,.‘._7.V.... an.“ 7 N |
M/s. Hariyali Restaurant Through Proprietor Shamim Ahmed
Shamim Ahmed
smt. Bano Begum
Bank of Baroda
Justice N.K. Agarwal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court