Dismissed
Godavati v. State Bank of India
Chhattisgarh HCMCC/1139/2000
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
JJTOuTO-C^**°* 'tri-t<^s?.s13a'q.a.s-Kj…
What the court decided
AI extract
JJTOuTO-C^**°* 'tri-t<^s?.s13a'q.a.s-Kj…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Sl.:. i.
Sanaasoad
,a.:
^5Iiol^"^^T3'TnH AISS 320^0 isaHn Homvonddv '8'V
s Cl'iAt" 6'.7 ®.mri"'t"^cy^^^ ^'^--:-3'^^ .-"^ ^ -'y^y^ "•^ T^^ •^ f^"?T'v3^ tUri. '£/ •SBys^ o/-s 'A-BS q+n^siTSSH Tjqg 0/3 ABS d:3^73U3S.tea T.jqg •2 JJTOuTO-C^ **°*
'?8aBAp'^ .'••."""•"
1
^WtK*
;7^^J^;'S!
I; ..-i
~~^ii.[> <).) - u.j.inn-"?-'"-^^^ o-w ?- a i"''^t '^y*-'°z.•i^^' i •^
ry-
^S^fZ "^o ~ <c /
L--^-'^" ' • . ......^ i /
^S^fZ "^o ~ <c / 'tri-t <^s?.s13a 'q.a.s-Kj ^--'Ty}'!^'"':^:^''!!^^ 'jnarepSBp n '^ 'nsqs^.jndTBpSB^ T'T'??TT^?T • -TT^s n'TT^n0'?? °:J l.9 L fr £'s t^.c'tij •^-1. i ~rt- ^1"' ^/-?L--^-'^" ' • . ......^ i / '-' '"•:") '^ —»<-/'l"./¥'i°'^y tTOirejg TroTsueq-xs -[Sjnq.inOTuS-n o^a'S' • ^. •S-/' vi>^ss" ^S"/'- •^ A-^ 8J9SBC3^ tJOUE^ t[3T10jq»v^-T^^ .<7. -^ .'-^•T-r^ (J30CTJO ra^-TOO) ^qiaog p^' ^ jy-a ^ ^^)—n--3^ f ——,? L^ ,/ ^ ' ^y^^yvry —11 .3.UTO..-T 'slT^>UiTtX'3?iT 'S"0?30^-T ^^3f^ mepBM-.,-+.^.i'"a-»^'^3^.t'Z'aaoT).T'ia8Tos'H ABM '• 1"^w.reo' ^- -/"^^-T-y^-7'^-^?../.•' - ' ^, '^-A ^s^?/-^'^'2" •1. ®TPuijo 2fu% 3^-eq.g S£?@GM)dSTOA^^l-V.i^V.V^'S^AI^Il.rf.r ^.J.
( s'ns.isA } / »^»^.':\ -'-ll'-i-L'susvs .TF^i'TT^T^??'?5 {'d'K) srs.T^ T ' rty^c?i-?i.>^^.T.- n AT it^'R.-i •-"•'d. -U<—3—+»UQU/y U-y T)T'SL72;"'i5TT~!.^y^ ^4'^t^~:r4^1 n^/^./?•,' • 5"^3^r"'':;C1 T'T:"?<''.'!L''t'?Ti^•4E'Ai^o!.-;!^ p^i •'(4-u-&.?mr-
'ON asafiaiga
WWTSS.3V
OOOZ/ (y^f^'Otl •0'0'K \fa.4*T.-'r^a. i-'ii/ '-TH'TT^PT'^cu.ia. j. V G. i' 2.' d,iJvV ^vn.'i'.V^'THn'^.i-j.Ci.lit.i.f V?^'!J^-llj.l' -^ntS.U ,T,^?n^:nd.1 Ci.-!. IL^ aJ H^iJ.JclynTrj"~7n;?Tr^T>^MLU ^X (Swj) ipu^ ^
•y^i,^
St'USOOOOOdO
/..^' '^^rT'^^"^;^
aa.
;a-r{c—78
^
.y^.-Jirai^yT. ^frCTTS;. t^WlT
^
•^
TVt^-W ^TffT^i. MC... ...\^ 20
a.n-^T t^K ( ^IT^T )
sv^s'i v v^nw w^w Ti^ sn^s ^-/TT-^'^r^ ^fr-.fi nf f^T,rf ^T?.n
'a'v. ?T^( ww -^ '^TR ifrr?i
S.B. Hon'ble Shri Jiutice N.K. Asarwal
14.08.2012 !
None for the appellant.
None for the respondents. |
The matter is called for hearing twice. On both the occasions,
none appears nor any represenjtation is made on behalf of the
appellant. Tlie appellant may not |?e interested in the matter.
In view of the above, thp matter is dismissed for want of
prosecution. No order as to costs.
Consequently, M(0)PNo. 11875/2000 also stands disposed of.
N.K Agrawal
Judge
Saiiu
u
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court